The Politics of Mediocrity
The most frustrating thing about Sarah Palin is not her political views, nor is it the winking and “folksy” word play she so often falls back on (“say it ain’t so Joe,” etc.). The really frustrating thing is the effect she had on the dumbing down of American politics and journalism. The bar has been substantially lowered (think the high jump before the Fosbury Flop). Moreover, the way she is covered in the media represents a species of journalistic apathy and disinterest that has reached unprecedented levels.
George W. Bush tapped this particular keg when someone floated the meme that he was the type of guy you’d want to have a beer with. Palin brought this to a new level. The response to Palin’s first and only debate with Senator Joe Biden was generally positive. She “did what she was supposed to do” and stayed on her “talking points.” She was referred to as “folksy” and a “soccer mom.”
These general descriptions do not provide any real insight into Sarah Palin, nor do they tell us if she understands any of the issues in question. She is able to remember a few key words, phrases, etc. and then spit them out when called upon to do so. But who can’t do that? And why is no one suggesting that rote memorization does not a VP make?
Her ability not to stumble over words, her tendency to explain an answer by repeating the question, and her ability to make people smile does not mean that she should be considered a valid candidate. Her ability to make us feel that she is “like” us, even though she is able to purchase a $5,000 suit jacket (US Weekly) does not make her a valid candidate.
What we have here is a lack of understanding. Eight years of Bush lowered expectations. Palin has the great ability to do the Hannity/Limbaugh thing. She knows how to play on folks’ fears by spewing nonsense. Palin is a lot like a Fox Network anchor.








MSNBC carried her latest hate speech this am...
Even if she hadn't been spewing racism and fear, she would STILL be the most annoying politician on the planet. Her whole demeanor and delivery reminds me of a really insincere and condescending children's minister, the kind you wouldn't want having charge over your kids.
You don't have to burn books to destroy a culture. Just get people to stop reading them.
---Ray Bradbury
- Email this page
By LiberalIconoclastOctober 7, 2008 - 12:21pmHas anyone called her out on this?
What about the Painful/McCrash supporters who scream, "KILL HIM!" and "TERRORIST"? Has Painful and McCrash rebuked said statements?
Mmmm ... no. That would require having balls, which the MSM doesn't have and both of which these two fucking assholes lack.
"She's Cheney in drag." Me
- Email this page
By Pookie2112October 7, 2008 - 1:00pmBut you see, Pook...
Violent behavior is OK if it's PATRIOTIC. On another thread, Mentallyfuckedup was saying he's for Palin because she's going to crack down on liberals. They're a bunch of fucking brownshirts and if the October surprise is martial law, I plan to take a few of them with me.
You don't have to burn books to destroy a culture. Just get people to stop reading them.
---Ray Bradbury
- Email this page
By LiberalIconoclastOctober 7, 2008 - 1:11pmSilly me. I forgot that wee detail.
Isn't it always the crazy ones who say they'll crack down on their dissenters? See: Hitler, Mussolini, Amin, Saddam, et. al. Seems like Painful and McCrash are in 'good' company ...
"She's Cheney in drag." Me
- Email this page
By Pookie2112October 7, 2008 - 1:17pmWhat everyone seems to forget or not notice is that there has
been a very quiet and insidious crackdown on liberal dissent in this country for the past three decades. It began under Reagan, and is now reaching its pinnacle under the Bush regime. There's no need for the unseemly tactics of the Nazi brownshirts, breaking up opposition rallies with wooden batons and angry fists. The modern fascist does his work with money and propaganda. Dissent is quelled by eliminating the voices of dissent that appear in the media. Phil Donahue gets canned despite having the most popular show on his network at the time. Dan Rather is pushed out of CBS News, replaced by a Katie Couric who invites Rush Limbaugh to be a guest commentator in her first week as Rather's replacement. Montel Williams loses his long-running show because he has the temerity to speak the truth on Faux Noise. The Dixie Chicks boycotted because they don't slavishly support the regime's pet war in Iraq. Hollywood actors including Susan Sarandon and Tim Robbins blacklisted for having the bad taste to speak out against the war.
Why bust heads when you can make an even more powerful point by eliminating dissenting voices from the media that helps form public opinion? When average citizens only see one point of view, that of the ruling regime, they conclude that the views of that regime are universally shared by all Americans. Those who consider dissenting are forced to re-evaluate their views, as they know that dissent can cost them their jobs, destroy their careers.
Physical violence can be left to the unwashed masses. The true power brokers know that dissent is best quashed in the dark.
Truth is whatever you can get other people to believe - Tom Smothers
- Email this page
By UffdaguyOctober 7, 2008 - 2:07pmYou speak the truth, Uff...
Even if Obama wins, I don't see things changing long-term. By controlling the media, perhaps things are already set up for Palin to become the next Reagan and establish Fat Karl's Thousand-Year Reich.
GOP PREVAILS
STRENGTH THROUGH UNITY
UNITY THROUGH FAITH
You don't have to burn books to destroy a culture. Just get people to stop reading them.
---Ray Bradbury
- Email this page
By LiberalIconoclastOctober 7, 2008 - 2:32pmI wouldn't worry about St. Sarah
This campaign has exposed her myriad personal and political weaknesses. When McCain loses in a landslide next month, she will slink back to Alaska, there to face the Troopergate investigation without the support of McCain and the RNC. She'll be lucky to survive the rest of her term.
Being branded as a "loser" will doom her national future in the eyes of the party and the voters. Recent years have shown that when someone is on a losing ticket, they rarely get a chance to run for president again; they are seen as damaged goods. Gore and Kerry never ran again, and Edwards wasn't getting any kind of party or voter support before he dropped out. No, Palin is toast on the national scene.
If you want to worry about a fundie christian, worry about Huckabee. He is everything Palin is not. He doesn't have to pretend to be likeable, to be an average guy. He doesn't have to worry about a spouse that is a member of a seccessionist group, doesn't have a pregnant teenage daughter, never faced any accusations of abuse of power, never wasted his time winking at the camera or telling a debate moderator that they weren't going to answer their questions, never tried to avoid speaking to the media for fear of showcasing his ignorance. Yet, he is a fundie, and he has some very libertarian economic ideas that would make the current economic disaster look like a walk in the park. On top of that, he did very well in the primaries, and appears to have a good head start for 2012. If you keep your eye on Palin, you're gonna miss the Huckabee baseball bat to the head in the next election. Look for him to position himself as the top candidate going into 2012. Obama will have a tough re-election bid on his hand in 4 years.
Truth is whatever you can get other people to believe - Tom Smothers
- Email this page
By UffdaguyOctober 7, 2008 - 3:22pmI think Sarah was chosen
precisely because she is expendable. McCain has no chance and never did. They didn't want to waste a viable candidate on such a losing proposition so they made a statement with the symbolic nomination of a woman just the way the Dems did with Ferraro in 1984.
- Email this page
By gt6October 7, 2008 - 5:44pmIt's the media
I blame so much of this on the media. They stopped asking the hard questions years ago. They lead the news. I was watching David Gregory this morning on "Morning Joe" and he kept saying, "America doesn't know Obama, Obama is mystery. America knows McCain. America relates to Palin."
Gregory has spewed this so much on his show that I believe people let this become subconsciously imbedded. Gregory is pretending to me non-partisan, but he keeps saying this over and over again.
It was a conservative group that said that the media coverage on Obama was negative 78% of the time and less than 50% on McCain. There is no more fair and balanced.
- Email this page
By deanrddOctober 7, 2008 - 12:42pmThe most ultra-cool thing that I can think of...
Obama does his No Drama act on McCain's health care and deregulation records, and old Crash loses it. He walks past the boundary line and challenges Obama to step outside. Obama meanwhile, smiles and doesn't break a sweat as Crash shits his pants with rage.
Probably not. It's likely McBush's handlers will have the old man drugged up. But one can hope!
You don't have to burn books to destroy a culture. Just get people to stop reading them.
---Ray Bradbury
- Email this page
By LiberalIconoclastOctober 7, 2008 - 3:35pmIf I were Obama's debate preppers, I'd work with him on
subjects and delivery methods that would get McCain rattled and angry. Past history, including comments from other repub senators, makes it clear that he has a very short fuse, and generally a person like that will only get angrier and angrier if they are delivered in a cool, calm, non-confrontational manner. If you need proof, just look at any thread with hatey. He loses it completely within just a few minutes, and gets wilder and wilder as he is calmly confronted and proven wrong over and over again.
Truth is whatever you can get other people to believe - Tom Smothers
- Email this page
By UffdaguyOctober 7, 2008 - 3:46pm