Roll Back the Reagan Tax Cuts

Yes, you heard me right – roll back the Reagan tax cuts.
The national debt has grown by more than $4 trillion during George W. Bush’s Presidency. The bailout plan could add hundreds of billions of dollars to the national debt. It’s the biggest increase under any president in U.S history. OMB estimated that next year’s national debt would hit $10.4 trillion
The Center for American Progress reports “The conservative practice of cutting taxes while spending millions on wars has led to the largest debt in half a century, and Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) is proposing exactly the same policies. An analysis by the Center for American Progress found that if McCain’s economic plan was in place for eight years, it would leave a debt of $12.7 trillion, besting Bush’s record.”
The Center for Budget Policy and Priorities reports, 42% of the “fiscal deterioration” and explosion of the deficit that occurred under Bush was due to tax cuts.
After the Republican Great Depression, FDR put this nation back to work, in part by raising taxes on income above $2.3 million a year (in today’s dollars) to 91 percent, and corporate taxes to over 50% of profits. The revenue from those income taxes built dams, roads, bridges, sewers, water systems, schools, hospitals, train stations, railways, an interstate highway system, and airports. It educated a generation returning from World War II. It acted as a cap on the rare but occasional obsessively greedy person taking so much out of the economy that it impoverished the rest of us.
Through the 1950s, though, more and more loopholes for the rich were built into the tax code, so much so that JFK observed in his second debate with Richard Nixon that dropping the top tax rate to 70% but tightening up the loopholes would actually be a tax increase.JFK pushed through that tax increase to take us back toward FDR/Truman/Eisenhower revenue levels, and we continued to build infrastructure in the US, and even put men on the moon. Health care and college were cheap and widely available. Working people could raise a family and have security in their old age. Every billion dollars (a half-week in Iraq) invested in infrastructure in America created 47,000 good-paying jobs as Americans built America.
But the rich fought back, and won big-time in 1980 when Reagan, until then the fringe “Voodoo economics” candidate who was heading into the election trailing far behind Jimmy Carter, was swept into the White House on a wave of public concern of the Iranians taking US hostages. Reagan promptly cut income taxes on the very rich from 70% down to 27%. Corporate tax rates were also cut so severely that they went from representing over 33% of total federal tax receipts in 1951 to less than 9% in 1983 (they’re still in that neighborhood, the lowest in the industrialized world).
The result was devastating. Our government was suddenly so badly awash in red ink that Reagan doubled the tax paid only by people earning less than $40,000/year (FICA), and then began borrowing from the huge surplus this new tax was accumulating in the Social Security Trust Fund. Even with that, Reagan had to borrow more money in his 8 years than the sum total of all presidents from George Washington to Jimmy Carter combined.
In addition to badly throwing the nation into debt, Reagan’s tax cut blew out the ceiling on the accumulation of wealth, leading to a new Gilded Age and the rise of a generation of super-wealthy that hadn’t been seen since the Robber Baron era of the 1890s or the Roaring 20s.
And, most tragically, Reagan’s tax cuts caused America to stop investing in infrastructure. As a nation, we’ve been coasting since the early 1980s, living on borrowed money while we burn through (in some cases literally) the hospitals, roads, bridges, steam tunnels, and other infrastructure we built in the Golden Age of the Middle Class between the 1940s and the 1980s.
We even stopped investing in the intellectual infrastructure of this nation: college education. A degree that a student in the 1970s could have paid for by working as a waitress at a Howard Johnson’s restaurant (what my wife did in the late 60s - I did so working as a near-minimum-wage DJ) now means incurring massive and life-altering debt for all but the very wealthy. Reagan, who as governor ended free tuition at the University of California, put into place the foundations for the explosion in college tuition we see today.
The Associated Press reported on August 4, 2007, that the president of Nike, Mark Parker, “raked in $3.6 million [in compensation] in ‘07.” That’s $13,846 per weekday, $69,230 a week. And yet it would still keep him just below the top 70% tax rate if this were the pre-Reagan era. We had a social consensus that somebody earning around $3 million a year was fine, but above that was really more than anybody needs to live in America.
In the worldview Americans held in the 1930-1980 era, Parker’s compensation was reasonable. But William McGuire (aka in the business press as
“Dollar Bill")taking over $1.6 billion - $1,600,000,000.00 - from the nation’s second largest health insurance company (you wonder where your health care dollars are going?) would have been considered excessive before the “Reagan Revolution.”
There is much discussion of what the floor on earnings should be - the minimum wage - but none about the ceiling. That’s largely because effectively there is no ceiling, and those who control vast wealth in America are happy to have Americans fight over “How poor is too poor?” just so long as nobody asks “How rich is too rich?”
When Reagan dropped the top income tax rate from over 70% down to under 30%, all hell broke loose. With the legal and social restraint to unlimited selfishness removed, “the good of the nation” was replaced by “greed is good” as the primary paradigm.
In the years since then, mind-boggling wealth has risen among fewer than 20,000 people in America (the top 0.01 percent of wage-earners), but their influence has been tremendous. They finance “conservative” think tanks (think Joseph Coors and the Heritage Foundation), change public opinion (Walton heirs funding a covert effort to change the “estate tax” to the “death tax”), lobby congress and the president (who calls the “haves and the have-more’s” his “base”), and work to strip down public institutions.
The middle class is being replaced by the working poor. American infrastructure built with tax revenues during the 1934-1981 is now crumbling and disintegrating. Hospitals and highways and power and water systems have been corporatized. People are dying.
And Bush, following closely in Reagan’s footsteps, is making things worse:
The debate about whether or not to roll Bush’s tax cuts back to Clinton’s modest mid-30% rates is absurd. It’s time to roll back the horribly failed experiment of the Reagan tax cuts. And use that money to pay down Reagan’s debt and rebuild this nation.Since Bush has been president: over 5 million people have slipped into poverty; nearly 7 million Americans have lost their health insurance; median household income has gone down by nearly $1,300; three million manufacturing jobs have been lost; three million American workers have lost their pensions; home foreclosures are now the highest on record; the personal savings rate is below zero - which hasn’t happened since the great depression; the real earnings of college graduates have gone down by about 5% in the last few years; entry level wages for male and female high school graduates have fallen by over 3%; wages and salaries are now at the lowest share of GDP since 1929.








We may have our chance
Maybe the economic crisis offers the opportunity as well as the necessity to raise tax rates. After all, the upper class hated Roosevelt's tax increases enough to attempt a coup, so how much worse could it be now? Remember that though the argument will be made that taxes can't be raised with the economy so bad, Roosevelt did it during the depression, and the increases helped stabilize the economy, not to mention the nation's politics. It was hardly a sure thing democracy and the Constitution would survive if Roosevelt hadn't shown the people things could get better.
The Raven's Blog: May the Better Bird Win
http://www.ravensblog.net
- Email this page
By ericfOctober 9, 2008 - 11:25amWell said ravensblog
Definately true!
Wasn't it GW's grandpa that organized the attempted coup??
- Email this page
By nobush3peatOctober 9, 2008 - 4:47pmTo paraphrase Rush Limpdick
"Reagan is dead!"
- Email this page
By blogbobOctober 9, 2008 - 10:02pmI just don't see why these
I just don't see why these Repubs see Raygun as a god?
Sure he made the economy "look and feel" good... by basically borrowing his ass off!
I could go out and max out my credit card and have an amazing time... doesn't mean that I'm rich though, it will catch up with me... Raygun's policies are finally catching up with us (one could say out chickens are coming home to roost)...
-- McCain = Four more years of the same --
- Email this page
By dtaylo75October 9, 2008 - 12:10pma new deal for banks...
although it doesn't seem to be working yet.
- Email this page
By scottso360October 9, 2008 - 3:49pmThe nearly one trillion "keep- the- investment- class- rich"
plan will fix the economy just as well as continuing to fund an illegal occupation to the tune of 10 billion per month will ensure national security.
The reality is they accomplish the exact same thing. They ensure Bush's rich buddies, including the multi-millionaire Nancy Pelosi and the millionaire Harry Reid, will stay rich while at the same time bankrupt our treasury and ruin our economy and murder our nation.
Multi-national monopolies are not loyal to our country, nor are those that profit from their misdeeds. This means they not only don't represent Americans in Congress, they despise the annoying peasants.
They realize all of us are not moronic enough to believe this bullshit, but think there's not a fucking thing we can do about it. They haven't seen our game face yet.
- Email this page
By AntillectualOctober 9, 2008 - 7:48pmGroup wants probe of McCain’s gambling winnings
Maybe he's just a loser...
- Email this page
By f u bush2October 9, 2008 - 4:51pmOh, stop yer bellyaching...
[whining McSame voice] It's all good fun after all; I'll report it if it goes over $5 million, my floor for the Upper Class. Better that you look at the association of "THAT ONE" [gestures with thumb] over there....
Cindy? Cindy? You miserable Cunt! Where's my Viagra?
- Email this page
By blogbobOctober 9, 2008 - 9:55pmBush is getting ready to hand the white house over
to Obama.
- Email this page
By f u bush2October 9, 2008 - 4:52pmSo what happened with Jeff Farias?
NovaM has had some changes in their network. Both on air and behind the scenes.
Jeff is great and I hope he gets a show again. It sounds like he left because a producer was let go by the network.
And while we are on the topic of good hosts that are without shows, BRING BACK SEDER!!!!!!
- Email this page
By f u bush2October 9, 2008 - 6:36pmWell put Eric
It is so right in front of us, that the R's mantra of saying exactly the opposite of the truth, to them, is not lying. We know better.
I came up with this a long time ago.
Those that invent something, for example the Computer, should have a free and fair accumulation of reward for their accomplishment. However, those that simply manage a company for example Lee Raymond, the Waltons, have no right what so ever at reaping massive piles of cash on the backs of millions of laborers and consumers world wide. Bill Gates did something before and after anyone else ever did both in design, marketing, and future development of the computer. Lee Raymond signed a document creating the Mobile Opec Cartel, and the Exxon/Mobile merger. Whoopdy shit! He did not invent OIL.
If you want to listen to the R's of today you'll hear that the "American worker is the best in the world", but what you won't hear is "I'm gonna create jobs for those workers". Instead we get rhetoric of financial understanding that the top needs a bailout for the bottom to stay afloat, NOW.
The continuous bullshit of todays campaign, based on current events with media hyped mudslinging has crippled this democracy into hate filled crowded who STILL KNOW NOTHING ABOUT AMERICA, and must be changed now. Did you hear any suggestions by the current candidates about why and how this crippled democracy could be fixed, needs to be fixed or is even broken? How out of touch Washington REALLY is.
LOSE ONE MORE DOLLAR of ours AND YOU LOSE YOUR HEALTHCARE, MR. SENATOR< CONGRESSMAN< SCOTUS< AND EXECUTIVES.
If Washington DC wasn't neck deep in the fault of this BS, then why are they the ones Lobbying for money, becomeing lobbiest, bailing out their BASE, and still not worried about loseing their Healthcare or pensions?
Sounds to me that the best job in the world right now is a tax payer subsidies cushy government job. WHO THE F$%^ IS GONNA PAY FOR THAT YOU IDIOTS?
Had enough yet?
"Where are the goddam Lawyers? Why aren't charges being brought on somebody for "deceptive business practices"
Bastiat
- Email this page
By BastiatOctober 9, 2008 - 6:42pmIt's very simple my fellow prisoners.
I have finally calculated the suffering threshold needed to wake ignorant Americans up as to why their livelihood sucks, and get off their fat. holier-than-thou, you-think-your-smarter-than-me-don't-you asses and protest seriously in D.C, to demand justice.
Once we have more people in poverty than we have room in newly built detention centers, we will have the surplus we need to still march millions in lockstep to Washington to demand our democracy back, and force the few people in Congress who actually have a conscience to step up and do the right thing.
- Email this page
By AntillectualOctober 9, 2008 - 7:35pma mccain supporter used the n-word
against an african american reporter at a mccain rally, says paul begala.
- Email this page
By scottso360October 9, 2008 - 9:32pmbig surprise
was it on tape?
- Email this page
By blogbobOctober 9, 2008 - 9:57pmWay to go, Thom!
You've just put concisely what I've been poorly saying for the last four years. CEOs are like lemmings; they will run off the cliff like the one before them if they think there might be profit over the cliff. Time to put the brakes back on. Hell, we can even up the highest tax bracket from $3Million to something outrageous like $100 million, but not obscene like $500 million. We will have the chance again this January when the Dems take back both houses (65+ votes in the Senate and a solid majority in the House) and the White House. All the Repugs in the Senate will be able to do is fillibuster, but really, how long can one of them stand in the senate chamber?
- Email this page
By blogbobOctober 9, 2008 - 10:01pmrepubs with the annenberg foundation
palled around with bill ayers.
- Email this page
By scottso360October 9, 2008 - 10:52pma palin supporter--in front of palin--
said "kill him (obama)!"
did palin correct him?
- Email this page
By scottso360October 9, 2008 - 10:53pmyap, the cowpie plan....
does not appear to be working yet.
- Email this page
By scottso360October 9, 2008 - 11:35pmWow...
This is so economically ignorant that it boggles the mind.
Did you by any chance take a look at tax receipt growth after the tax cuts were implemented? The tax revenue grew by staggering leaps and bounds under lower rates.
- Email this page
By monkeybrownOctober 15, 2008 - 8:03amBy monkeybrownOctober 15, 2008 - 9:03am
More spam from the racist cracker. Same goes to the other sock puppet.
- Email this page
By f u bush2October 15, 2008 - 8:50amYou are ALL FOOLS
Go back and look at the growing tax revenues and you will see that they problem is not in how much money the government takes in but how much money the government spends. If the democratic fools in congress would stop trying to buy votes by spending money on anything and everything and actually show some fiscal responsibility we would see the deficit get smaller. But NOOO! It is so much easier to play class warfare games and continue to buy votes by spending money the government doesn't have.
Go ask some middle class person, the people you say deserve the breaks for a job sometime, then go ask Bill Gates, the same person you want to tax into oblivion for a job and just see who can employ you.
Don't also forget the one principle that you can't even imagine, every time you raise tax rates, tax revenues fall and every time you lower them, tax revenues grow. But I know that doesn't support your hatred for those greedy evil rich people.
Your wealth envy is showing very bad.
- Email this page
By obamasuxOctober 15, 2008 - 8:18amthe ignorance of history posted by some
There are so many things blatantly wrong about this article that it is difficult to know where to start, but let's start with FDR. Anyone who is a true student of both history and politics would know that the New Deal failed. FDR's socialist bohemoth actually made the depression worse and prolonged it. I love how the author states that the increased taxation brought about all these miraculous things (including the interstate highway system, which was Eisenhower, not FDR) without taking into consideration that after the market crash of 1929 and the worldwide post WW1 economic depression which proceeded it, we were left with very few millionaires and most of them "old money". So while there were some to tax heavily ( the very ones who could have provided more valuable jobs than the New Deal) there was not enough to generate the cash levels required by the birth of the socialist welfare state of FDR. So where did this money come from? In true liberal fashion , DEFICIT SPENDING. Before you argue that Republicans engage in it, I won't argue that, too many do, but that hardly changes its origin. The author also overlooks the fact that the functions and authority granted to the Federal government by the Constitution hardly include the welfare state i.e. the New Deal. The single major factor that saved the economy of this country was War production. WW2. This however bought us only a temporary reprieve as none the the FDR institutions were dismantled after the war, as they should have been. We, the taxpayers, have been paying for these ever since, in increasing amounts every year, capped by LBJ's Great Society. The Great Society has flushed over SEVEN TRILLION dollars down a welfare sewer in a misguided effort to end "poverty". There will always be poor because there will always be the lazy, the sorry and the ignorant. That's why social programs fail, they never account for how sorry some people are. Yet those on the left bemoan the "lack of money" to fund the toilet they created, while never bemoaning the costs of it to the middle and upper classes. Yet these same leftists "cry" for a middle class they aren't part of (where does Obama live?) yet have no problem in creating the very roadblocks to economic growth through excessive regulation and high taxation. You wonder why the jobs leave the country? Ask Nancy Pelosi or Harry Reid. The current Federal budget has 600 BILLION of the welfare state, the LARGEST part of the budget for a function that legally, the government is NOT allowed to do. But you don't cry about that? The illegal immigration nightmare costs the taxpayers over 330 BILLION a year. Where's the Democrat outrage there? None, so long as they can buy the votes of the dumb masses with money and wealth created and earned by the rest of us.....And you people want more.......sad....
- Email this page
By captain3565October 15, 2008 - 4:44pmThe new deal was a great accomplishment
When you hear or read someone saying it was a failure, you know it's one of these right wing pussies who believe Iraq was a good idea but won't go over there out of cowardice.
- Email this page
By f u bush2October 15, 2008 - 5:51pmSpoken like a True Socialist
Don't talk about the substance of the post(you can't) but attack the poster.
- Email this page
By obamasuxOctober 16, 2008 - 6:55amRaygun was a terrible actor
and an even worse president
- Email this page
By f u bush2October 16, 2008 - 7:02am