Dubai Ports Request 45 Day Investigation

News:
DP World has asked the U.S. Committee on Foreign Investment for a 45-day investigation of its acquisition of P&O's U.S. terminal operations. The request came after a huge uproar in Congress over the sale of security at U.S. ports to a United Arab Emirates-owned company. A spokesperson for the White House said, "he was pleased that Dubai Ports reached a middle ground with Congress." National Security adviser, Stephen Hadley said he and his people will work with Congress as long as it does not block the transaction.

45 Days??

Come on America! Wake the hell up and check out the FACTS.
BLOCK THIS CORRUPT 'INSIDER DEAL' NOW!
(Oh and did you know Vancouver BCs', another critical BORDER port is also involved??
Sec. Kemmett and others in the Senate hearing chastise the Democrats only(??) for not knowing about this 'deal' because its been "written about since last Oct and has been "a done deal since Nov" according to White House spokesman Bartlett. (if Bush didn't know, who the hell is he speaking for??). And probably the fastest recorded response by this administration was on this 'transaction/deal': The first BBC piece appears on Oct.31, CFIUS holds its first 'meeting' in early Nov.
(Maybe if the networks had shown floating dollar bills in New Orleans....?)
But the following headlines by the British Business press between October 2005 thru January 2006 proves that the only 'done deal' in Oct. or early Nov. had to be between the U.S. and Dubai, exclusively. P&O was no where near making a final deal with anyone until Feb. 13, 2006.
But Scott McClellan said every cabinet head agreed to 'the deal'.
Or was he referring/spinning to the other 'deal' -between Dubai and the Administration?

Other points:
P&O was a failing company. The stocks have been soaring now for 5 months, and Dubai Ports World was just formed in 2005.
The owners and stockholders should be revealed.
Ded the Admin force out other bidders? And force Dubai in.
Did the Bush Administration, who seemed to know months in advance that Dubai was going to takeover P&O before P&O did(??), just throw in the ports as part of their 'other deal'??
They gave away our ports at a time when the ex Chief of Terrorism for DHS said our port security was 'horrendous'? And with our Canadian borders so vulnerable? And when our lives need to be tapped into because 'we could be missing that 'one' mushroom cloud of a phone call??
BUT THEY'RE NOT CONCERNED ABOUT A HUGE FRIGGIN BOAT'??

But more important:
The Admin says we can't say no to this because -we'll offend them???!!

HAVE THEY REALLY LOST THEIR F#$@^#@$ MINDS!!
BUSH AND THE REPUBLICAN PARTY HAVE BEEN TELLING THEM AND EVERYONE ELSE IN THE WHOLE WORLD TO F@#$ OFF FOR YEARS!!

Read on to to see how set in stone the Dubai 'deal' really was:
*Oct. 31, 2005*
"P&O Jumps on Hope of Bidding War"
...Denmark and Hong Kong show interest along with Dubai.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/4392472.stm

*Nov. 29, 2005*
"P&O Agrees on Bid from Dubai"
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/4480542.stm

*Dec. 2, 2005*
"Bid Talks Send P&O Shares Higher"
...another takeover offer in the air by Singapore
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/4493014.stm

*January 10, 2006*
"P&O Receives Further Takeover Bid"
...Singapore beats Dubais offer
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/4600382.stm

*Jan 26, 2006*
"P&O Backs Takeover Bid From -SINGAPORE!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/4649360.stm

A 'done deal' my ass!!
45 DAYS MY ASS!!

Ann Coulter might just get some 'traitor' action after all.

By motherwolfeFebruary 27, 2006 - 6:18pm