News:
As throngs of protestors gathered around the world to mark yesterday’s third anniversary of the war in Iraq, President Bush and top administration officials put on their best smiles and hit the Sunday circuit to assure prospective voters that up is down, black is white, and there is no civil war in Iraq. This bit of good news came as a surprise to former Iraqi Prime Minister Ayad Allawi who, citing the daily death toll in his country, said, “If this is not civil war, then God knows what civil war is”. Insurgents apparently agreed, and greeted the anniversary with a series of bombings that killed at least six members of the country’s security forces. Also on the third anniversary of the war, more insight into the culture of abuse and torture that permeates American detention centers in Iraq and around the world. The latest revelations surround a top-secret Special Forces unit, “Task Force 6-26”, and show that the pattern of abuse was hardly limited to low-ranking Reserve units, as the Pentagon has sought to depict it.
Yesterday Cheney kept LINKING this baby to 9-11. SURPRISED???
Yesterday Cheney kept LINKING this baby to 9-11. SURPRISED???
What part of Bush's ADMISSION that there was NOT,annnnnnd is NOT a LINK between Iraq & 9-11 does Cheney NOT get?
Is it the L part? or the fuckin' K at the end?
- Email this page
By AfricaBambaMarch 20, 2006 - 10:40amI'm not surprised
I'm not suprised that you can not make the link. All the data just out how Bin Laden made visits to IRAQ. Even Saddams mistress stated that same thing. In the end you wouldn't believe Saddam himself if he stated there was a link. Anyway, let me ask you this. Where is you evidence that there was no link?
- Email this page
By JPNMarch 20, 2006 - 4:27pmfrom the downing street memos
jack straw is still a proponent of the war in iraq. he is the foreign secretary of great britain under blair. he secretly said, "there is no credible link between saddam and osama."
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoMarch 20, 2006 - 4:34pmThe key word is "credible".
The key word is "credible". Again, where is your evidence that there was in no way any link.
- Email this page
By JPNMarch 20, 2006 - 4:35pmcredible means honest, i think.
so there is no honest link between saddam and osama.
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoMarch 20, 2006 - 4:36pmeverything
in the universe is linked to a certain extent.
so an uncredible link is worth over 2300 body bags?
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoMarch 20, 2006 - 4:37pmSo what you are telling me
So what you are telling me is that your evidence that there was no link is just an opinion?
- Email this page
By JPNMarch 20, 2006 - 4:47pmProving the negative
Logic does not work this way. Those who claim a link between Osama and Saddam
are obliged to prove their case with credible evidence. Those who deny the link
are vindicated if no such proof is found. For example, I cannot prove there are
no unicorns, but based on all the available evidence I can state that their
existence is unlikely.
- Email this page
By robotzoMarch 20, 2006 - 4:59pmThere has been evidence
Obviously you guys will never believe anything released because in your mind there can be no link. Saddams mistress stated that Saddam met with Bin Laden twice that she new of. Is she credible?
- Email this page
By JPNMarch 20, 2006 - 5:05pmsaddam's mistress said that?
do you have a link for that?
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoMarch 20, 2006 - 5:10pmPull your head out of your nether region JPN
Hey -- the same people who want to control
our ports go falcon hunting with Bin Laden.
2. George W.'s first business partner was
a Bin Laden. But of course, no one has asked
about the link there! If you want to go on
whispers, fine. But it's a FACT that the
dictator-in-chief has LONG ties with the BinLadens.
- Email this page
By HobbitGoddessMarch 20, 2006 - 7:31pmSo when Clinton claimed that
So when Clinton claimed that there was nuclear, chemical and biological weapons, did he lie?
- Email this page
By JPNMarch 20, 2006 - 5:07pmclinton lied
so bush can lie. very moral.
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoMarch 20, 2006 - 5:11pmEvidence? Your Prez ADMITTED there is NO LINK !!!!
Evidence of NO LINK?? What ,you don't BELIEVE your President's ADMISSION that there is NO LINK???
- Email this page
By AfricaBambaMarch 20, 2006 - 8:11pmrobotzo
that is a good point.
also, i would say it takes very strong evidence to justify over 2300 body bags. i would say that it would take a very strong link to justify that.
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoMarch 20, 2006 - 5:12pmwould you
like a link on the jack straw quote?
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoMarch 20, 2006 - 4:34pmrummy
said there is no strong link between saddam and osama.
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoMarch 20, 2006 - 4:35pmWhere is your information
Where is your information that states there was no link?
- Email this page
By JPNMarch 20, 2006 - 4:36pmSo I guess if there was a
So I guess if there was a weak link then there was a link. Or, is a weak link in your mind "no link"?
- Email this page
By JPNMarch 20, 2006 - 4:38pmrummy
publicly said there was no strong link. jack straw secretly said there is no credible link.
so we have over 2300 body bags for a weak link?
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoMarch 20, 2006 - 4:40pmStill waiting for your data
Still waiting for your data that states "there was no link? 2300 body bags? We had more body bags filled by murders in the USA.
- Email this page
By JPNMarch 20, 2006 - 4:45pmmore murders in the US...
how many americans in the US? how many americans in iraq?
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoMarch 20, 2006 - 5:02pmI don't think
I ever said there was NO link.
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoMarch 20, 2006 - 5:03pmso jpn
you think that being in iraq is safer than being in the US. then you should enlist.
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoMarch 20, 2006 - 5:04pmHave we had an attack since
Have we had an attack since 9-11?
- Email this page
By JPNMarch 20, 2006 - 5:09pmanthrax
the killer not found.
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoMarch 20, 2006 - 5:13pman attack since 911?
madrid and london.
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoMarch 20, 2006 - 5:14pmI said USA us not another
I said USA us not another country.
- Email this page
By JPNMarch 20, 2006 - 5:17pmspain
was spain safer because they helped us invade iraq? how about england?
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoMarch 20, 2006 - 5:29pmwhy
why do we need wiretaps when we occupy iraq? i thought it's the occupation of iraq that is keeping us safe.
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoMarch 20, 2006 - 5:31pmso
we are not going to have another attack in the US because we occupy iraq?
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoMarch 20, 2006 - 5:15pmosama
said attacks take a long time to plan. he also said another attack is coming soon to the US. you don't believe him?
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoMarch 20, 2006 - 5:16pmI do believe him. That opens
I do believe him. That opens up another can of worms. Since the libs. have a problem with NSA wire taps and you guys letting that cat out of the bag. I honestly think we will be hit again due to liberal ignorance.
- Email this page
By JPNMarch 20, 2006 - 5:20pmosama
didn't know we use wiretaps. you think he is stupid?
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoMarch 20, 2006 - 5:30pmwiretaps
did wiretaps prevent the attacks on madrid and london?
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoMarch 20, 2006 - 5:30pmso
a weak link or an uncredible link is worth over 2300 body bags?
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoMarch 20, 2006 - 5:05pmbush said
there is no link between saddam and 911.
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoMarch 20, 2006 - 4:35pmWhere is that information
Where is that information detailed that there wasn't?
- Email this page
By JPNMarch 20, 2006 - 4:37pmyou don't
trust the word of jack straw and cheney?
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoMarch 20, 2006 - 4:39pmI trust that the information
I trust that the information is correct. Again, where is your evidence that there was no link?
- Email this page
By JPNMarch 20, 2006 - 4:41pmI'm still waiting for your
I'm still waiting for your evidence of "No link between Bin Laden and Saddam.
- Email this page
By JPNMarch 20, 2006 - 4:39pma link?
osama and saddam are both arabs? that's the real link. we racially profiled the whole country of iraq by invading it.
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoMarch 20, 2006 - 4:47pmGood one, Do you think the
Good one, Do you think the AEU and the Port deal was racial profiled?
- Email this page
By JPNMarch 20, 2006 - 4:49pmdubai deal
they laundered money for al qaeda. the russian mob is big in dubai. they have more of a link with osama than saddam did.
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoMarch 20, 2006 - 4:59pmI'm sorry that information
I'm sorry that information must have gotten by me. Where is this documented and by whom?
- Email this page
By JPNMarch 20, 2006 - 5:12pmwhich information
are you talking about? i'm sure that there is a lot that gets by you. you repubs tell black kids to do their homework when you don't.
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoMarch 20, 2006 - 5:18pmare you
talking about the dubai deal? i'll get you a link or two. hold on.
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoMarch 20, 2006 - 5:19pmthis got by you
Bin Laden's operatives still using freewheeling Dubai
DUBAI, United Arab Emirates (AP) — Osama bin Laden's operatives still use this freewheeling city as a logistical hub three years after more than half the Sept. 11 hijackers flew directly from Dubai to the United States in the final preparatory stages for the attack.
The recent arrest of an alleged top al-Qaeda combat coach is the latest sign that suspected members of the terrorist organization are among those who take advantage of travel rules that allow easy entry. Citizens of neighboring Gulf states such as Saudi Arabia can come to Dubai without visas, which other nationalities can get at the country's ports of entry.
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoMarch 20, 2006 - 5:26pmmore got by you
Dubai still "plays a key role for al-Qaeda as a through-point and a money transfer location," Kohlmann said, although he also noted the country could be working to combat such activity with "an aggressive but low-profile intelligence strategy."
al-Qaeda isn't the only organization that has found Dubai useful. The father of Pakistan's nuclear program, Abdul Qadeer Khan, has acknowledged heading a clandestine group that, with the help of a Dubai company, supplied Pakistani nuclear technology to Iran, Libya and North Korea.
Emirates officials refused to discuss the country's latest steps to combat terror.
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoMarch 20, 2006 - 5:37pmLook
All I'm saying is that in order to say there was no link then there must be some detailed data that backs that up. Just saying it over and over don't make it true. You can split hairs any way you wan't but the data just released states there was no matter how small. I don't understand why you would take the side of a nation that wants us distroyed. Not just me because I am a conservative but our nation as a whole.
- Email this page
By JPNMarch 20, 2006 - 4:55pmjack straw
wants us destroyed?
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoMarch 20, 2006 - 5:01pmI think people like you want
I think people like you want us distroyed because you do a good job of being a trojan horse for our enemies.
- Email this page
By JPNMarch 20, 2006 - 5:14pma trojan horse?
so using my freedom and democracy is destroying america?
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoMarch 20, 2006 - 5:20pmtrojan
so freedom and democracy can destroy america?
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoMarch 20, 2006 - 5:21pmhmmm?
i may have used one personal insult with jpn. sorry. but it is true that many repubs on the net are very uninformed even though they are full of opinions. they don't do their homework. they tell black kids to do their homework when they don't.
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoMarch 21, 2006 - 11:02amjpn
i'm sorry. there is a link. osama and saddam are both arabs.
that justifies over 2300 body bags?
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoMarch 20, 2006 - 4:57pmjpn
i'm sorry. there is a link. osama and saddam are both arabs.
that justifies over 2300 body bags?
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoMarch 20, 2006 - 4:57pmEvidence of NO LINK?? What ,you don't BELIEVE your President's A
Evidence of NO LINK?? What ,you don't BELIEVE your President's ADMISSION that there is NO LINK???
- Email this page
By AfricaBambaMarch 20, 2006 - 8:14pmEvidence? Your Prez ADMITTED NO LINK !!!!!
Evidence of NO LINK?? What ,you don't BELIEVE your President's ADMISSION that there is NO LINK???
- Email this page
By AfricaBambaMarch 20, 2006 - 8:09pmno link
Saturday morning presidential address:
and now President George W. Bush-
My fellow Americans,
I wanted to clarify the reason I keep mentioning 9-1-1 and Saddam Hussien in the same sentence during my speeches. Although I said in a speech on March 20, 2006 “I know I didn't say that there was a direct connection between September the 11th and Saddam Hussein
- Email this page
By calikimkMarch 21, 2006 - 9:54amcheney
said there is not a civil war in iraq.
allawi, our puppet in iraq, says there is a civil war.
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoMarch 20, 2006 - 10:41amExactly! What part of CIVIL does Cheney NOT get?
Exactly! What part of CIVIL does Cheney NOT get?
Annnd Cheney still has not answerd what part of NO LINK to 9-11 does he NOT get?
- Email this page
By AfricaBambaMarch 20, 2006 - 10:43amafrica
amen.
jack straw, foreign secretary of great britain, said "there is no credible link between saddam and osama.
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoMarch 20, 2006 - 10:45amrummy
said if we leave iraq it will wind up being controlled by nazis. he must not have much confidence in the iraqi puppet govt to stop those nazis.
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoMarch 20, 2006 - 10:42amrummy also said
leaving iraq would be like leaving eastern europe to the soviets. we did leave eastern europe to the soviets and they eventually were liberated by their own people.
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoMarch 20, 2006 - 10:43amHappy Spring!
Well, springtime is here. The sun is shining, the birds are singing, the trees are budding, and all is right with the world. Well, perhaps not.
And in the Middle East, it is a special time of year as well. It's Iranian New Years day, and it's the first day of year 4 of the American occupation of Iraq. The sun is shining, the birds are singing, the bombs are falling, and something is fishy in Denmark.
It appears that the U.S. and Iraq can't even agree as to whether the country is in the middle of a civil war. Meanwhile, the Bush administration has been ratcheting up the rhetoric regarding Iran, in a manner eerily similar to that employed prior to the U.S. invasion of Iraq.
The United States insists that Iraq is not in the midst of a civil war. Meanwhile, the Former Prime Minister of Iraq, Ayad Allawi is adamant about the fact that Iraq is indeed in a civil war. Allawi is quoted as saying: "We are losing each day as an average 50 to 60 people throughout the country, if not more,...If this is not civil war, then God knows what civil war is." Let's see here... The U.S. government, who has always painted a rosy picture of Iraq, vs. the former P.M. (who actually lives in the country). Hmmmm. Who would you believe?
Whether there truly exists a state of civil war in Iraq, in the grand scheme of things, is immaterial. Call it what you want, civil war, insurgency, spring-cleaning, whatever. It's pretty clear that this pre-emptive war, waged by the U.S. and the coalition of the coerced, has taken a devastating toll on Iraq and its people.
Iraq by the numbers:
There have been many estimates on the number of civilians killed as a result of the U.S. invasion of Iraq. The Pentagon, if pressed, would likely use one of the lowest estimates of around 16,000-20,000. There have also been estimates made of over 100,000 Iraqi civilians killed since the start of the U.S. military action. There is, however, an organization called The Iraq Body Count Project, which bases their estimates on reported deaths from multiple news sources, and has a methodology that involves corroborating data before posting their numbers.
IBC's current civilian death toll is between 33,679 and 37,795. I will have their counter displayed on my blog until this war (both the invasion and the resulting civil war) is over.
The current number of coalition military casualties in Iraq, according to iCasualties.org, is at 2525.
The current number of Iraq security forces killed in Iraq since the start of the war, is 4294. This, also according to iCasualties.org.
This is just a partial snapshot of the human toll of this war. It does not include unreported Iraqi civilian deaths, or deaths of members of Sadaam Hussein's military at the start of this war. It does not take into account the Iraqis who have died from disease, who might otherwise have gotten the medical attention they needed, but the aftermath of this war prevented it. Also not included are the countless Iraqis who have lost their homes, their possessions, their security, and any semblance of a normal life. The dead can be buried. Buildings can be rebuilt. But the true human toll of this tragedy will likely never be fully understood, or completely addressed. And this is the legacy that the Bush administration wants to leave to the Middle East.
So, to the people of Iraq, Happy Spring! Enjoy the flowers and the sunshine, and try to dodge the bullets and bombs.
And to our friends in Iran, Happy New Year! Looks like President Bush and company are working on a very special surprise to celebrate the event. If Iraq "liberation" is any indication, this party is gonna be a real blast!
"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful and committed citizens can change the world."
Check out my blog:
http://truth-for-a-change.blogspot.com/
- Email this page
By MarlipernMarch 20, 2006 - 1:38pmThey and the Democrats never could defeat the USA!
BAGHDAD — U.S. military deaths during the past month have dropped to an average of about one a day, approaching the lowest level since the insurgency began two years ago, according to a USA TODAY analysis of U.S. military data.
The decline in U.S. deaths comes as Iraqi casualties are the highest since the U.S. military began tracking them in 2004.
In the past month, nearly five times as many Iraqi forces and civilians were killed as troops in the U.S.-led coalition in Iraq, U.S. military data show.
The shift from spring 2004, when U.S. and Iraqi casualty rates were comparable, reflects an insurgency that increasingly targets Iraqis and the growing presence of Iraqi forces on the front lines.
“The Iraqi army is far bigger in number, far higher in training capability and far more willing to go where the fight is and take casualties,
- Email this page
By dt509erMarch 20, 2006 - 2:23pmhmmmm?
http://icasualties.org
the above website indicates that the body bag rate is still at 2.3 per day. no real change. no real improvement. this would appear to contradict the USA Today analysis. dt, do you have a link for that USA Today analysis?
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoMarch 20, 2006 - 2:33pmdt?
The decline in U.S. deaths comes as Iraqi casualties are the highest since the U.S. military began tracking them in 2004.
In the past month, nearly five times as many Iraqi forces and civilians were killed as troops in the U.S.-led coalition in Iraq, U.S. military data show.
DT, IS THIS GOOD NEWS? SHOULD WE CELEBRATE BECAUSE YOUR ARTICLE SAYS MORE SAND BLACKS ARE DYING INSTEAD OF WHITE AMERICANS?
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoMarch 20, 2006 - 3:20pmGood news
One must fight for freedom dimwit and some must sacrifice their lives for such. US troops have led by example and now the majority of causalities will be taken by Iraqis. Damn people, you bitch up a storm when Americans die and when they don't. And yet the best you can come up with is to use American troops to hammer away at George Bush (See Harry ‘Abramoff’ Reid). Looks as if your buddies in France are falling apart again……hmmm wonder why. Oh by the way, why do Frenchmen, Blackmamba and StrutNuts have brown pants when they served as members of the military?
- Email this page
By dt509erMarch 21, 2006 - 12:56amit's like
bush using a 911 coffin in his campaign commercials.
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoMarch 21, 2006 - 10:52ambush's stated goal
in iraq was to use them as a lightening rod for the terrorists, to keep them away from us. now we are paying impoverished iraqis to be our human shields against the terrorists in iraq. so we must be terrorists, according to what i believe was one of your own definitions of what a terrorist is....someone who uses innocent people as human shields.
on the other hand, i don't think your "good news" is accurate. the body bag rate continues to be about 2.3 body bags per day. no improvement.
but i see you are glad that more sand blacks are dying so that fewer white americans are killed. for a racist, that is good news.
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoMarch 21, 2006 - 10:56ampersonally
i don't see more sand blacks dying as good news. and if US casualties are down, they are far from over. still 2.3 body bags per day.
repubs hold black kids accountable for their mistakes, but not bush.
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoMarch 21, 2006 - 11:00amdt thanks
On the third anniversary of the U.S.-led invasion, however, a wave of violence against Iraqis is prompting talk of civil war. In an interview Sunday with the British Broadcasting Corp., former interim prime minister Ayad Allawi said, “We are losing each day as an average 50 to 60 people throughout the country, if not more. If this is not civil war, then God knows what civil war is.
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoMarch 20, 2006 - 4:03pmhuman shields
RAND Corp. military analyst Nora Bensahel says the increasing level of Iraqi casualties “means Iraqi security forces are in positions of responsibility.
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoMarch 20, 2006 - 4:05pmdt, your article
doesn't say how many iraqi units are completely independent.
"Meanwhile, Iraq's 240,600 security forces increasingly are fighting insurgents directly, the Pentagon says. Sixty-three Iraqi units are operating independently or in a lead role with coalition support, up from 37 in September. Iraqi Defense Ministry spokesman Mohammed al-Askari says military recruiting remains strong, despite the rising casualties."
WOULD LIKE YOU TO SHARE THE LINK WITH US JUST IN CASE YOU DID SOME CREATIVE EDITING.
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoMarch 20, 2006 - 4:08pmReally!?!?!?!
March 16, 2006 — Following are the ABC News Investigative Unit's summaries of four of the nine Iraqi documents from Saddam Hussein's government, which were released by the U.S. government Wednesday.
The documents discuss Osama bin Laden, weapons of mass destruction, al Qaeda and more.
The full documents can be found on the U.S. Army Foreign Military Studies Office Web site: http://fmso.leavenworth.army.mil/products-docex.htm.
Note: Document titles were added by ABC News.
"Osama bin Laden and the Taliban"
Document dated Sept. 15, 2001
An Iraqi intelligence service document saying that their Afghani informant, who's only identified by a number, told them that the Afghani Consul Ahmed Dahastani claimed the following in front of him:
That OBL and the Taliban are in contact with Iraq and that a group of Taliban and bin Laden group members visited Iraq.
That the U.S. has proof the Iraqi government and "bin Laden's group" agreed to cooperate to attack targets inside America.
That in case the Taliban and bin Laden's group turn out to be involved in "these destructive operations," the U.S. may strike Iraq and Afghanistan.
That the Afghani consul heard about the issue of Iraq's relationship with "bin Laden's group" while he was in Iran.
At the end, the writer recommends informing "the committee of intentions" about the above-mentioned items. The signature on the document is unclear.
- Email this page
By dt509erMarch 20, 2006 - 2:33pmdt, from your website, or really from rummy's website
At the request of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the US Army Foreign Military Studies Office has created this portal to provide the general public with access to unclassified documents and media captured during Operation Iraqi Freedom. The US Government has made no determination regarding the authenticity of the documents, validity or factual accuracy of the information contained therein, or the quality of any translations, when available.
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoMarch 20, 2006 - 2:38pmdt, very objective source you found.
Foreign Military Studies Office
Joint Reserve Intelligence Center
Operation Iraqi Freedom Documents
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoMarch 20, 2006 - 2:50pmdt
basically, rummy is your source. rummy also said he knows where the wmd are.
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoMarch 20, 2006 - 2:51pmdt?
names.
Rumors of Iraqi and Saudi volunteers to fight against the US in Afghanistan
ISGQ-2003-00004500-0
Synopsis: Fedayeen Saddam received news of a rumor that 3,000 volunteers from Iraq and Saudi Arabia had traveled to Afghanistan to fight with the Mujahideen against the US. This letter is a request to investigate the rumor to determine whether it is true.
Original Arabic Text
AGAIN ARABIC TEXT WHICH THE PENTAGON IS "INTERPRETING" FOR US. BUT IF TRUE SO WHAT? BLAIR IS INVESTIGATING WHETHER BRITISH CITIZENS ARE TRAVELING TO IRAQ AND AND AFGHANISTAN TO FIGHT THE US.
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoMarch 20, 2006 - 2:53pmdt, something missing here.
"That the U.S. has proof the Iraqi government and "bin Laden's group" agreed to cooperate to attack targets inside America."
http://fmso.leavenworth.army.mil/products-docex.htm
dt, i couldn't find the above statement on this page. could you point it out to me?
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoMarch 20, 2006 - 4:13pmdt, maybe these are the wmd...
*Page 9 of 14
(TC: This page contains a list of personal items).
1- Toothbrush + paste
2- Comb
3- Shampoo + soap
4- Toilet paper
dt, your post and your link don't seem to match up.
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoMarch 20, 2006 - 4:21pmthe bathroom wmd can be found here...
http://www.ctc.usma.edu/aq/AFGP-2002-001120-Trans.pdf
scroll down to bottom of page.
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoMarch 20, 2006 - 4:23pmReally?!?!?! Really!?!?!?!
The US Government has made no determination regarding the authenticity of the documents, validity or factual accuracy of the information contained therein, or the quality of any translations, when available.
From same website.
Twit.
- Email this page
By glamrock69March 21, 2006 - 7:49pmdems
the dems are not trying to defeat the US. they are just using their freedom and democracy. you don't seem to like freedom and democracy.
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoMarch 20, 2006 - 2:35pmdt?
ttp://fmso.leavenworth.army.mil/documents-docex/Iraq/ISGZ-2004-028947.pdf
dt, this document is in arabic it seems. can you read arabic?
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoMarch 20, 2006 - 2:45pmdt?
http://fmso.leavenworth.army.mil/documents-docex/Iraq/ISGZ-2004-019920.p...
this one is also in arabic. but so what if iraqi intel said there are some al qaeda members in iraq. i believe there are cia documents that say there were some al qaeda members in the US before 911.
one cia document given to bush said, "Bin Laden Determined to Strike in US."
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoMarch 20, 2006 - 2:48pmA Peace symbol or Benz marketing?
Check this site out and scroll down to 'How do you draw a peace symbol'. Lefties sure have some smart ones out there in la-la land.
http://michellemalkin.com/
- Email this page
By dt509erMarch 20, 2006 - 2:52pmMichelleMalkin.com? Buuwaaaaaa haaa haaaa !!!!
MichelleMalkin.com? Buuwaaaaaa haaa haaaa !!!!
She and Coulter do parodies of the right better than Stephen Colbert. Ok, ok----ALMOST better than Colbert Report!!
Buuwaaaaaa ha haa hee hee
- Email this page
By AfricaBambaMarch 21, 2006 - 8:45am