News:
After days of remaining mute while anonymous White House officials took his excuse for a few test laps, President Bush finally stood up yesterday and told an audience what it already knew: he ordered the leaking of highly classified intelligence reports to counter public skepticism of his case for invading Iraq. Bush sought to spin the leak as a public service, without explaining why he felt the need to obscure the source of the information; when facing questions about whether the leak was part of a larger campaign to smear former ambassador Joe Wilson—as is certainly special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald’s suspicion—the president once again became reluctant to comment on an “ongoing legal proceeding”.
A public service?
Yeah, I'm sure the NSA spying program is a "public service" as well. And when we kill Iraqi citizens, that's a public service as well. And when we rape the student loan program, that's a public service as well. And the huge deficit, and the skyrocketing national debt, those are public services as well.
I'm so glad Dubya is so concerned with public service. Perhaps he can do the public a huge service... and resign.
"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful and committed citizens can change the world."
Check out my blog:
http://truth-for-a-change.blogspot.com/
- Email this page
By MarlipernApril 11, 2006 - 8:32amIf it was only
that simple. All presidential administrations (and, for that matter, practically all elected groups, from school boards on up) are self-serving. Occasionally, the people they purport to represent are benefitted, sometimes, they aren't. I'm sure the Kansas school board members who insisted on "both sides" in the evolution debate being represented in the science curriculum thought they were doing a swell job. So what, if they wanted to establish a mid-west branch of the Flat Earth Society. They thought they had the sway to make it happen, and for a while, they did. Once they made everyone around them look as stupid as a bag of rocks, out they went.
Unfortunately, Shrub and the junta have honed the skill of setting up fall guys for everything they do. They don't only spin information in a self-serving manner. They operate from a position of leadership through fear and intimidation. They actively go after anyone they think will prove an impediment to their schemes.
Remember how greenhouse gases were eliminated from the NOAA report on climate change. Same as the EPA report where text critical of the administration was deleted. Not derided or minimized, but entirely deleted. Not surprising given the representation of pharmaceutical company board members in the administration (including Rummy). It's been a standard practice (and poorly kept secret) for drug companies to only present those data that promote the use of their products. Sound familiar?
- Email this page
By davecbtApril 11, 2006 - 12:22pmThe Death of a Nation
It is still we the people who decide what our government is, whether a despotism or republic. We can work to oust all the lazy, kept, bought, spineless DEms, and take back the government. Or we can continue down the road of worthless public education, where here in Ma. we're cutting back on History, 'because it's not asked on the MCAS'. Ass backwards educational standards: where our kids are trained to be databases, not thinking, analytical Americans who know when they're being fed bullshit.
Until we get behind, say, Ned Lamont, or the 50 vets who are running against the CO-addled Dem incumbents, .....and ensure they pass a law that allows ONLY taxpayer funded elections, we'll be owned by the corporations now ruining our country.
With an ignorant citizenship, with a corrupt citizenship, our 'delicate experiment called 'democracy' is doomed.
DeTocqueville said that in 1842, about. John Quincy Adams said, not if, but "When the people become corrupt, despotism is the only form of government they can handle."
He who is silent in times like these is a coward and not worthy of existing in a republic. A peasant in a business suit comprises the 37% who STILL think this illegal president O.K.
Bush is a mass murderer and the entire junta should be impeach
- Email this page
By patrioticpilgrimApril 11, 2006 - 9:09pmpatriot
the repubs are in control. you should be happy.
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoApril 11, 2006 - 11:07pmMT--Tushe' ! "Patriot" Archy Bunker is railing against wrong cr
MT--Tushe' ! "Patriot" Archy Bunker is railing against wrong crowd.
It's the fuckin'cons who control EVERYTHING!!
Don't tell me there is NOOOOOOOO difference between Democrats and CONS.
Geeeeeeezuuus !!!!
- Email this page
By AfricaBambaApril 12, 2006 - 7:58amamen
the dems are certainly not perfect, but they are all we've got.
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoApril 13, 2006 - 10:36amamen
the dems are certainly not perfect, but they are all we've got.
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoApril 13, 2006 - 10:36amTheir silence betrays their guilt.
Perhaps in the end Bush will be found innocent of any illegal action, but just like Cheney after he drunkenly shot his friend, Bush knows he has done something terribly wrong. In all things dubious, when Bush believes he’s right he stands up immediately to say so for every one to hear. He knows he has plainly and unquestionably deceived the American people for YEARS over this action and now everyone knows it. His investment in deceit is paying tax free dividends in disgrace. He gets to keep every bit of ill will his actions generate. I’ve worked in a therapeutic setting with pathological liars and his behavior fits the patterns I saw with them. Start with one self serving lie, big or small, and when it stands to be scrutinized pile so many lies on top of it that the truth becomes foreign to you. You start to live in those lies, and even when you are forced to admit that things you’ve said aren’t true you taint your confessions with more self serving fiction. Bush cannot get ahead of this story for two reasons one is personal and one is practical. To come clean about this would be antithetical to the identity Bush has constructed for himself during his presidency and perhaps his whole life, his pride will not allow it. Now we can see, perhaps, why pride is the foremost of sins. The practical reason is that Honesty is not part of Bushes political agenda and so investing the energy to rebuild his public support would distract him for the business he is about. He knows that to go down that road will further discredit his already dubious mission, handing the nation over to the wealthy. Bush is now completely unable to lead this country, no one believes his swagger. W stands for dubious.
- Email this page
By gbonesApril 11, 2006 - 10:27amWhat's the problem?
Commander Bush is only employing a strategy long ago legitimized by the far religious right. When one is dealing with democrats, progressives, confused independents and others who disagree, it is perfectly acceptable to lie to them because they are the puppets of Satan. Because the vile toxins of satanically induced independent thinking have poisoned their minds, they must be manipulated with necessary fictions.
Goldwater said it 4 decades ago. “Extremism in the cause of justice is no vice.
- Email this page
By gerardomundoApril 11, 2006 - 10:56amI Don't Think Bush is Really That Religious. . .
This seems to come up a lot - Randi talked about it on her show yesterday - that these conservatives believe in Revelations and Armageddon and everything that accompanies it. I don't think Bush is particularly religious - I think it's all an act to pander to that wing of his party. Truly spiritual people don't feel the need to broadcast it in the manner he has (think 'crusades', saying God told him to do certain things, etc.) One of the most moral and spiritual people ever in the White House was Jimmy Carter - and he didn't have to proclaim it every day.
Instead of giving them their desired mantle of 'righteous indignation', I prefer to call it like I see it - fear mongering and war profiteering.
- Email this page
By angstallApril 11, 2006 - 11:22amJimmy Carter, George Bush, ye shall.....
.......be known by your works.....
They can say whatever nonsensical thing that may come into their heads, but you will KNOW them by what they DO. That's the traditional rendering, if you want modern....
If you talk the talk, better walk the walk.
"Liberalism is trust of the people tempered by prudence. Conservatism is distrust of the people tempered by fear."
William Gladstone, 4-time Prime Minister of Great Britain.
- Email this page
By rocklibApril 11, 2006 - 12:09pmcult leaders
Bush and this administration, including cheerleadres like Pat Robertson are as religious and spiritual as your average cult leader. Where's Janet Reno when you need her to get the ATF to raid the ranch at Crawford, TX?
For the record, I would prefer their incarceration to how Waco played out.
Speak The Word. Revolution! "Operation: Mindcrime" -Queensryche
- Email this page
By sowkdanApril 11, 2006 - 12:12pmSowK--"The Promiseland"--Queensryche !! Rocks
SowK--"The Promiseland"--Queensryche !!
I love that song. Lyrics and everything.
I juxtapose it with my "Dante' Symphony" by franz Lizst at parties.
Freaks people out. Heavy metal next to trancendant classical piece.
Hey, don't knock it 'till ya try it.
- Email this page
By AfricaBambaApril 12, 2006 - 8:03amReligion
Many liberals would label themselves "spiritual but not religious." I would characterize the neocons and chicken hawks as religious but not spiritual. They take their orders from a flat, rigid dogma that tells them what to think. Most spiritual orientations e.g. compassion, generosity, forgiveness, honesty, and yes integrity are actually liberal sentiments that are largely repugnant to neo-cons.
If you look at the massive lie campaigns assembled by Jesus-blessed millionaires like Mellon-Scaife, James Dobson et al you can see in boldface religion operating quite happily in the absence of spirituality
- Email this page
By gerardomundoApril 11, 2006 - 2:17pmCan I get an........
......amen, brother?
"Liberalism is trust of the people tempered by prudence. Conservatism is distrust of the people tempered by fear."
William Gladstone, 4-time Prime Minister of Great Britain.
- Email this page
By rocklibApril 11, 2006 - 2:34pmAmen.
And Blessed Be.
"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful and committed citizens can change the world."
Check out my blog:
http://truth-for-a-change.blogspot.com/
- Email this page
By MarlipernApril 11, 2006 - 2:41pmGerardo--Amen #2 bro. piercing observation
Gerardo--Amen #2 bro. piercing observation.
Cuts right thru the haze
- Email this page
By AfricaBambaApril 12, 2006 - 8:06amWho do they think they are kidding?
The Bush administration is a very self serving organization. If saying something will help their image they'll say it, if saying something will harm their image they won't say it. They constantly use the excuse of not discussing an on going investigation to avoid a topic they don't want to discuss, however if it is a topic they want to discuss they will discuss it inspite of any current investigations. They evidence seems to suggest they will even declassify information soly for political reasons with little regard for national security. Likewise they will classify information that has no national security value for political reasons. They use a double standard in this regard, and I think most Americans realize this. In the Bush Administration silence is an admittion of guilt. Who do they think they are kidding?
"It was believed afterwards that the man was a lunatic, because there was no sense in what he said." "The War Prayer" by Mark Twain
- Email this page
By QuantaApril 11, 2006 - 11:00amAll this talk about lying
All this talk about lying and deceiving, it sounds to me like your talking about Clinton.............. For years you all have been asking Quote:"What did he know and when did he know it" So he declassified some information that IN NO WAY PUT OUR COUNTRY IN HARMS WAY" Not like Clinton who under his admin gave China the keys to hard chip technologies and multiple war head capabilities. But that was then correct? That is a typical LIB response. NO OUTCRY ABOUT THAT. You are all nothing but a bunch of SOCIALIST who will spin this country in turmoil. Full medical benefits for everybody? ON WHO'S DIME, MINE? I already pay too much and owed more for 05 tax season. Take more for me and you will have big problems... LOOK at NJ, a state I live in with a Governor that claimed he wouldn't raise taxes.... We laughed about that and bet some LIBs that that would happen.... Guess what it did and guess where his approval rating is... IN THE CRAPPER. Why because when he raised taxes people were surprised (Ignorant LIBs that seem to vote that way based on a 30 sec. sound bite on TV)and spoke up about it. It didn't take my party to try and vilify the guy. People just woke up and said he lied... Oh like that was any secret that taxes would go up... JOKE. WHY DOSEN'T YOUR PARTY RUN ON WHAT THEY REALY INTEND TO DO IF (A BIG WORD)THEY GET POWER BACK. It won't take a bunch of conservatives to turn the people against your party of big government higher taxes pushing for some sort of socialist utopia. They will reject your party altogether. YOU ARE ALL NOTHING BUT A BUNCH OF SOCIALIST.
- Email this page
By JPNApril 11, 2006 - 12:19pm" I already pay too much and owed more for 05 tax season"
What??? You mean you didn't benefit from Dumbya's swell tax cuts?
And why are you always so pissed JPN?? After all, you're living in Bush's conservative utopia, aren't you?
We're all socialists eh? Well, as always, one should be judged by the company one keeps. So tell me again... why are you always hanging around here?
BTW... better socialists than FASCIST PIGS.
"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful and committed citizens can change the world."
Check out my blog:
http://truth-for-a-change.blogspot.com/
- Email this page
By MarlipernApril 11, 2006 - 12:44pmGood question???????? I ask
Good question???????? I ask myself that as well as my Repub. friends.... I don't have an answer to that other then it passes time in my boring "sit and wait for problems to happen" JOB.
- Email this page
By JPNApril 11, 2006 - 1:02pmConlet returns, still hasn't read......
.....any of our responses, or doesn't remember.
"All this talk about lying and deceiving, it sounds to me like your talking about Clinton"
"Well, that didn't take long. But "When Clinton lied, nobody died...unlike the Bush Crime Family, Inc. ..............
"For years you all have been asking Quote:"What did he know and when did he know it"
That started with the Criminal Enterprise known as the Nixon Administration. Turns out he knew everything, and he knew it from day one. And then we asked it about the Criminal Enterprise known as the Reagan Administration....he didn't know anything, ever, but his handlers/keepers did. Nah, Ronnie was in on it, too.
"So he declassified some information that IN NO WAY PUT OUR COUNTRY IN HARMS WAY"
He did declassify SOME, not all of a document. Whether that "declassification" is part of a coverup for criminal action (and the "declassification" may be shaky, too...as we have heard, there may be a process and rules for declassification which Bushbaby violated. Regardless, he participated in the outting of an undercover operative for the CIA and, more importantly, the destruction of a very valuable brass-plate cover...Brewster-Jennings, which gave us access to information regarding nuclear proliferation, particularly in the middle-east. Destroying that may very well end up getting us nuked.....AND I WOULD CALL THAT PUTTING US "IN HARMS WAY"
" Not like Clinton who under his admin gave China the keys to hard chip technologies and multiple war head capabilities. But that was then correct? That is a typical LIB response. NO OUTCRY ABOUT THAT.
Jeeezus....you obviously didn't read the multiple reponses this drivel got the LAST time you trotted out your little bullet point. Yes, here's my outcry...."THANK YOU BILL CLINTON FOR BEING SMARTER THAN YOUR CRITICS!!! Feeding selected information to KEEP OUR ENEMIES CLOSE is good statesmanship, good defense. Thanks, Bill...or an Thanks Ronnie RAYGUN for GIVING the Soviets our SOLID-ROCKET fuel technology, for the same reason.
"You are all nothing but a bunch of SOCIALIST who will spin this country in turmoil."
Yeah, yeah.....yawwwwwnnnn.... Prove it.
"Full medical benefits for everybody? ON WHO'S DIME, MINE?
Well, yeah, and mine too. Look Con-boy...YOU ALREADY PAY FOR IT....GET IT? PEOPLE WITH NO MEDICAL INSURANCE GO TO PUBLIC HOSPITALS' EMERGENCY ROOMS FOR TREATMENT, WHERE THE COSTS ARE MORE THAN DOUBLE, USUALLY TRIPLE WHAT A TRIP TO A DOCTOR COSTS A PERSON WITH A MEDICAL PLAN. A WELL-RUN GOVERNMENT MEDICAL PLAN IS....LISTEN TO THIS....CHEAPER THAN WHAT WE HAVE NOW, PRODUCES BETTER RESULTS, AND PROMOTES THE OVERALL HEALTH OF THE COMMUNITY. SO YEAH, YOUR DIME, AND MINE, AND EVERYBODY ELSE'S.
"I already pay too much and owed more for 05 tax season."
Ok, I'll ask this a THIRD time, you haven't answered the last two times, but libs tend to be optimists....HOW MUCH SHOULD YOU PAY? WHAT PERCENT OF YOUR INCOME SHOULD BE TAXED, and should it be a tax on all income, earned and unearned?
"Take more for [from?] me and you will have big problems"
Sounds like YOU will have the problems....I COLLECT those government checks, so I need you to pay more....inflation, you know.
... LOOK at NJ, a state I live in with a Governor that claimed he wouldn't raise taxes.... We laughed about that and bet some LIBs that that would happen.... Guess what it did and guess where his approval rating is... IN THE CRAPPER. Why because when he raised taxes people were surprised (Ignorant LIBs that seem to vote that way based on a 30 sec. sound bite on TV)and spoke up about it. It didn't take my party to try and vilify the guy. People just woke up and said he lied... Oh like that was any secret that taxes would go up"
Answer this....WHY did he raise taxes? What reality of governance did he encounter that would cause him to do something that hurt (and he KNEW would hurt) his political career? I suppose you know that the States, generally, aren't allowed to run deficits, like the Federal Government can, and does. If the state comes up against a significant shortfall, the taxes have to go up, or spending has to go down. The governor has limited influence on either, as these are handled by the State elected officials. But, once he made a promise like that, he set himself up.
And what's the point? That people don't like paying taxes? Duh. But they also don't like having sewer lines fail, potholes, bridges that crumble into the rivers, intermittent water service, garbage building up on the curb, rats running amok, etc. Ya pay for what ya get....but ya don't always get what ya pay for.
... "JOKE. WHY DOSEN'T YOUR PARTY RUN ON WHAT THEY REALY INTEND TO DO IF (A BIG WORD)THEY GET POWER BACK."
Hey Sparky, who do you think is going to pay the huge deficits (loans....with interest) that YOUR boy and the other Puds are running up? Get it through your head....this is TAX money they are spending and they are borrowing against future tax revenues....meaning you will get to pay those taxes after they have built up a bundle of interest....now, remember that I am profiting from this, as I have purchased some of the debt, so I am glad you will be sending me my money so that I can continue my comfortable life here in America's Pacific Paradise. So, thanks for supporting these Con idiots and making my life easier.
"It won't take a bunch of conservatives to turn the people against your party of big government higher taxes pushing for some sort of socialist utopia. "
Hey Sparky, the people have ALREADY turned against YOUR party of HUGE and INTRUSIVE Government and ENORMOUS Debt and PORK.....oh and Corruption...and war....and death....and all that crap. Take a look at the POLL NUMBERS!
"They will reject your party altogether."
As usual, Bass-ackwards....35% and DROPPING!
"YOU ARE ALL NOTHING BUT A BUNCH OF SOCIALIST."
...EHHHH, and what's yer point?
"Liberalism is trust of the people tempered by prudence. Conservatism is distrust of the people tempered by fear."
William Gladstone, 4-time Prime Minister of Great Britain.
- Email this page
By rocklibApril 11, 2006 - 1:12pmRegardless, he participated
Regardless, he participated in the outing of an undercover operative for the CIA and, more importantly, the destruction of a very valuable brass-plate cover
PROVE IT....... It's all hot air right now.
THANK YOU BILL CLINTON FOR BEING SMARTER THAN YOUR CRITICS!!! Feeding selected information to KEEP OUR ENEMIES CLOSE is good statesmanship, good defense.
Try for campaign cash... He sold us out....
It won't take a bunch of conservatives to turn the people against your party of big government higher taxes pushing for some sort of socialist utopia. "
Hey Sparky, the people have ALREADY turned against YOUR party of HUGE and INTRUSIVE Government and ENORMOUS Debt and PORK.....oh and Corruption...and war....and death....and all that crap. Take a look at the POLL NUMBERS!
Means nothing when the truth is what it is THE TRUTH the numbers will go back up.
Too much taxes slows the economy down people don't spend as much. This leads to job declines. NJ there are more people moving out of this state then coming in BIG BUSINESS another concept you all seem to despise is moving too. Question who picks up the tab we do..... It is getting harder to live in this state. Who is the majority party in this state? Democrats......... They always were. That is why this state is in shambles.
My point about the SOCIALIST COMMENT IS THIS..... BEFORE WE ALLOW THAT TO HAPPEN, YOU MUST DISTROY US..... I WELCOME THE DAY YOU ALL TRY.
Notice how I don't correct all your Typo's? You guys tear a person up and say ya see he can't spell he must be stupid but then again you must be too.
- Email this page
By JPNApril 11, 2006 - 1:42pmWhat absolute drivel.
And the scariest part is, you actually believe the fecal material coming out of your mouth.
Let me get this straight... you accuse the Dems. of "INTRUSIVE" government when Bushboy authorized an illegal domestic spying program.
You accuse the Dems. of Pork when your republican congress defeated their own immigration bill by tacking 397 amendments onto it.
You accuse the Dems. of creating "ENORMOUS Debt" when it's Bushboy, aided by his republican congress who took us from record surplus to record deficit.
Y'know, there's a clinical term for this... it's called DELUSIONAL.
Yep, keep drinking the kool-aid JPN. And have fun explaining to your children how you helped fuck up their future.
God Bless America.
"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful and committed citizens can change the world."
Check out my blog:
http://truth-for-a-change.blogspot.com/
- Email this page
By MarlipernApril 11, 2006 - 2:00pmHey, cool, .....
....a point-by-point response, finally, from the Con-let. Not exactly brilliant prose, but it's a start.
""Regardless, he participated in the outing of an undercover operative for the CIA and, more importantly, the destruction of a very valuable brass-plate cover"
"PROVE IT....... It's all hot air right now."
That's what will devolve from the investigation. These guys cover their tracks pretty well, so we'll have to see what Fitzgerald puts together...the good thing is that Bush is on his way out, and party loyalists don't have as much Bush loyalty anymore.
""THANK YOU BILL CLINTON FOR BEING SMARTER THAN YOUR CRITICS!!! Feeding selected information to KEEP OUR ENEMIES CLOSE is good statesmanship, good defense.""
"Try for campaign cash... He sold us out...."
I disagree. If he got money AND supported his oath to defend the country at the same time...cool.
It won't take a bunch of conservatives to turn the people against your party of big government higher taxes pushing for some sort of socialist utopia. "
""Hey Sparky, the people have ALREADY turned against YOUR party of HUGE and INTRUSIVE Government and ENORMOUS Debt and PORK.....oh and Corruption...and war....and death....and all that crap. Take a look at the POLL NUMBERS!""
"Means nothing when the truth is what it is THE TRUTH the numbers will go back up. "
Can't be "truth" until it happens....it's only HOPE, and a pretty slim hope, at this point.
"Too much taxes slows the economy down people don't spend as much. This leads to job declines."
And too little tax revenue and the infrastructure collapses. Our (Dem) mayor for a decade needed to deal with shrinking tax revenues as the economy slumped after the Japanese bubble burst and they stopped coming here and investing in local businesses. Roads were patched instead of being resurfaced, sewers were fixed temporarily, a lot of infrastructure repair wasn't done. We just had 6 weeks of rain, culminating in a day of deluge. Now...the road patches have come up...some of them are big enough to close lanes on the freeway...I'll bet there has been over a half million dollars damage to cars because of the road conditions, plus a lot of commuting delays. We had a sewer break that send record amounts of sewage into the ocean and boat harbor. These are all related to low tax revenues and the necessity of deferring maintenance and replacement. Too low taxes are a bad thing, too.
So, where is the ideal level, Jason?? Come on, give me your analysis.
"NJ there are more people moving out of this state then coming in BIG BUSINESS another concept you all seem to despise is moving too."
Wanna bet that a lot of them are moving OUT OF THE COUNTRY, and not just to low-tax states of the US??? Thank your Bushbaby for that....and Bill Clinton, too...he sort of supported NAFTA. Question who picks up the tab we do"
Thats right, since you are still there and using the infrastructure and services provided.
" It is getting harder to live in this state. Who is the majority party in this state? Democrats......... They always were. That is why this state is in shambles. "
If that's true, why do the people of NJ keep electing them? I suspect that the problems are a lot deeper and more diverse than just which party is in power in your state.
And you better believe it's getting harder to live in the UNITED STATES....all of them, yours included.
My point about the SOCIALIST COMMENT IS THIS..... BEFORE WE ALLOW THAT TO HAPPEN, YOU MUST DISTROY US..... I WELCOME THE DAY YOU ALL TRY."
Nah, we win the election, I'll bet you don't die, or move. You'll just enjoy the fruits of our labors....on the sly, of course...you wouldn't want your con buddies to know that you are enjoying any benefits from Lib changes.
"Notice how I don't correct all your Typo's? You guys tear a person up and say ya see he can't spell he must be stupid but then again you must be too."
Typos??? Such as?......
And, I don't think bad spelling is a sign of intellectual ineptituce. I think that the inability to express yourself verbally is a good sign of a mind that is less-than-facile with concepts. Like Dumbya.
"Liberalism is trust of the people tempered by prudence. Conservatism is distrust of the people tempered by fear."
William Gladstone, 4-time Prime Minister of Great Britain.
- Email this page
By rocklibApril 11, 2006 - 2:10pmRock, You Rock!
Well done. Thank you. In my comment to JPN, I knew the reference to the UN would lead to a Pavlovian reaction. His form of salivation: FUCK the UN! Except Resolution 1441 was given as the justification for launching the invasion of Iraq and the Colin Powell cartoon show was presented to give the administration a blue and white figleaf for their invasion. The Afghan invasion was sanctioned by the U.N. It hasn't been a roaring success, but guess what: Some of the most grueling fighting in that country has been undertaken by nations that opposed the Iraq action:
French Foreign Legionnaires & Airborne
Dutch Special Forces
Belgian Paracommandos
German infantry & airborne
Many of these forces have been stationed in the outer provinces, away from Kandahar where the warlords hold sway. It doesn't lessen the contribution made by our troops. Quite the contrary, it shows when the action is justifiable, we can count on the countries that don't always agree with us, but who have our backs when it counts.
To lambast the U.N. and "old Europe" as to blame for nay-saying, rather than being good allies, is like getting pie-eyed and starting a bar fight everyone knows you're going to lose, and blaming the friends who tried telling you repeatedly you had too much to drink, and stop picking fights.
The U.S. has gone it alone before. More often, we can count on the contribution and goodwill of other nations. That's enhanced when we are in the right. The arrogance of these bastards in saying, "You're with us or against us" managed to take sympathy for the U.S. from all-time highs to all-time lows. Sort of a funhouse mirror view of the domestic situation.
For a party that mouths fealty to personal responsibility, Republicans seem to have an aversion to taking responsiblity for anything.
If it were just a matter of Shrub being dumb (like Dan Quayle), he'd be funny. It isn't. His arrogance extends to dismissing science and evidence in favor of his gut feeling. Now I suppose it's easier to get a read on your gut when you perpetually have your head up your ass, as Shrub does, but even then...
- Email this page
By davecbtApril 11, 2006 - 2:36pmDave--Precisly. Sen. Biden made keen observation on B.Mahr's s
Dave--Precisly. Sen. Biden made keen observation on B.Mahr's show regarding Dumbya's "instincts".
The panel was discussing Bush & prayer,etc.
Biden said, "the scary thing is that I believe Bush makes decisions with his "gut" and then prays that he's right!!
W's got it ass-backwards !!!
Buwaaaaaaaaa haaaaaa haaaaa.... uhhhh,oh shit waaaaa aaaaaa aaa
- Email this page
By AfricaBambaApril 11, 2006 - 4:19pmi believe
three reporters have testified that karl rove and libby told them that joe wilson's wife works for the cia. but rove has not been fired.
well, i know two reporters have said that. maybe novak too.
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoApril 11, 2006 - 11:11pmI guess Bush letting China
I guess Bush letting China buy a large portion of our national debt isn't dangerous? It makes me pretty scared. This guy LITERALLY sold us out to China!
- Email this page
By tonyd0528April 12, 2006 - 1:24amI just love how these
I just love how these neo-cons like to point the finger at Clinton who has been out of office for over 5 years. Move on! At least we liberals were strong enough to openly say that we were disgusted by OUR president's reprehensible behavior which did not result in any death, by the way! We held him responsible for his actions and he was impeached BIpartisanly. Will that happen to the idiot frat boy from Crawford TX? No! They are going to point the fingers at the Democrats and talk about things that happened over 5 and going on 10 years ago!
Guys, we have to focus on getting Democrats back into Congress so that we can get back the checks and balances we so sorely need! It's so funny how Democrats always have to clean up the mess Republicans leave behind! Some may say the Dems may not have a clue on what to do with this mess that was made by guess who, the Republicans again(I, at times, feel the same way.)! However, I think America might be willing to find out what the Democrats may end up doing if given back control of Congress.
I am not going to let the blowhard neocons, like the wacko on this page, zap anymore energy from me. What IS worth using my energy on is "witnessing" to the rest of the nation how ANTI-Christian the Republican party as a whole (There are some good moderate Republicans out there. It's just too bad that they are not the majority in the GOP) actually is! How would Jesus vote, if he decided to get involved with man's government at all? He certainly would not vote for people who don't give a damn for anyone besides the big corporations just because they "claim" they are against abortion and gays!
PS: Rocklib, you definitely do ROCK!!!
- Email this page
By tonyd0528April 12, 2006 - 12:43amAl, is that you?
Peace NOW
This is a bad joke, right? This is Al Franken pulling our legs, right? No one is that naive or stupid. Al, that's a good one, but please stop; you're scaring us.
- Email this page
By impeachimApril 11, 2006 - 1:35pmHey JPN
One: I don't actually remember many of the details about the clinton administration, though from reading other's responses to you constant clinton references I gather that you are discussing some scandal that Clinton was never actually implicated in, and that you are drawing conclusions about his involvemnt with no evidence to support it. Yet, I must admit i can't really say from experience I am only a college freshman right now so you can understand how my memory of the 90's could be a little bit foggy, especially Clinton's first term.
Second, why do you think a democratic govenor would want to raise taxes now? Could it be that the cuts in federal spending and the cuts in federal taxes has shifted much of the burden from the federal level to the states? No, that be to logical, that couldn't happen right? Wrong! What good Bush's tax cuts do you if it forces states to raise taxes in order to take up the federal governments slack.
Finally, you are right that lying can really tank you approval ratings, ever wonder why Bush's ratings are in the 30's consistantly? Could it be that he has no credibillity because he has been caught lying to many times? Lets see if that can sink in, though I have a feeling not even one of Bush's nuclear bunker busters could crack your thick skull.
"It was believed afterwards that the man was a lunatic, because there was no sense in what he said." "The War Prayer" by Mark Twain
- Email this page
By QuantaApril 11, 2006 - 2:57pmAnd....
...a little more history.....During Clinton's impeachment trial...for perjury under oath about whether or not he had sex with an intern, his approval ratings were, and stayed, in the 60+% range. So, lying CAN be hard on your approval, but being an incompetent, hypocritical bonebrain seems to be worse.
"Liberalism is trust of the people tempered by prudence. Conservatism is distrust of the people tempered by fear."
William Gladstone, 4-time Prime Minister of Great Britain.
- Email this page
By rocklibApril 11, 2006 - 3:14pmAnd....
...you are dead on concerning the transfer of tax burden to the States along with the obligations. Not a bad thing, as I support a tax system that follows the responsibility, but you have to calculate that in when looking at where your taxes are going. If you get a tax break from the Feds, but your State tax goes up, then look at how much of the work of government is being done for you at the two levels. If the Feds eliminate a program that is needed in your state, and the state picks up the bill, your taxes didn't go up, or down, they are being transferred from Fed collection to State collection.
And, in the end, it isn't about how big or small or expensive government is, it's about what you get for your money....a cheap government which does nothing is too expensive. A good government which does good things is ............... priceless.
"Liberalism is trust of the people tempered by prudence. Conservatism is distrust of the people tempered by fear."
William Gladstone, 4-time Prime Minister of Great Britain.
- Email this page
By rocklibApril 11, 2006 - 3:23pmjpn
clinton is not president anymore. did you know that?
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoApril 11, 2006 - 11:09pmJPN...pull your head out
JPN,
Bush's policies and actions not putting our country "in harms way"? Please...acting as the poster boy for al Qaeda recruitment by torture and mistreatment of "detainees" (the MAJORITY of whom were/are innocent, BTW).."burning" an intelligence source by revealing we had an al Qaeda operative in custody with his laptop ( a source of, at the time, current intelligence info) for his own political advantage...revealing the identity of a COVERT (yes, she WAS covert)CIA operative for political gain and revenge (see a pattern, JPN?)...NOT listening to military leaders in conducting a war taht shouldn't have been launched in the first place...launching a first strike against a country who posed no imminent threat (this justifies a first strike by ANY country against ANY other country, JPN)...alienating other countries rather than building alliances through his dishonesty and recklessness -ALL of these things endanger America, JPN.
JPN, when you find an intelligent thought, be sure to let us all know -I'm sure we'd all like to pat you on the head in unexpected awe and admiration...
Rick
All this talk about lying and deceiving, it sounds to me like your talking about Clinton.............. For years you all have been asking Quote:"What did he know and when did he know it" So he declassified some information that IN NO WAY PUT OUR COUNTRY IN HARMS WAY" Not like Clinton who under his admin gave China the keys to hard chip technologies and multiple war head capabilities. But that was then correct? That is a typical LIB response. NO OUTCRY ABOUT THAT. You are all nothing but a bunch of SOCIALIST who will spin this country in turmoil. Full medical benefits for everybody? ON WHO'S DIME, MINE? I already pay too much and owed more for 05 tax season. Take more for me and you will have big problems... LOOK at NJ, a state I live in with a Governor that claimed he wouldn't raise taxes.... We laughed about that and bet some LIBs that that would happen.... Guess what it did and guess where his approval rating is... IN THE CRAPPER. Why because when he raised taxes people were surprised (Ignorant LIBs that seem to vote that way based on a 30 sec. sound bite on TV)and spoke up about it. It didn't take my party to try and vilify the guy. People just woke up and said he lied... Oh like that was any secret that taxes would go up... JOKE. WHY DOSEN'T YOUR PARTY RUN ON WHAT THEY REALY INTEND TO DO IF (A BIG WORD)THEY GET POWER BACK. It won't take a bunch of conservatives to turn the people against your party of big government higher taxes pushing for some sort of socialist utopia. They will reject your party altogether. YOU ARE ALL NOTHING BUT A BUNCH OF SOCIALIST.
Submitted by JPN on April 11, 2006 - 12:19pm
- Email this page
By RickDerrigApril 14, 2006 - 12:13pmSo does this mean Bush will fire...himself???
Bush talking to reporters in Chicago, Sept 30th 2003
"There's just too many leaks. And if there is a leak out of my administration, I want to know who it is. And if the person has violated law, the person will be taken care of."
- Email this page
By potatocattleApril 11, 2006 - 12:09pm"taken care of"
See, Shrubis actually smart....a person caught leaking will be "taken care of." Probably like when you screw up in his administration, you get a medal. Georgie will give himself a medal for leaking. "Heck of a job Dumbya."
- Email this page
By clausen1April 11, 2006 - 12:21pmLet's go back and see how
Let's go back and see how many Socialist, I mean Democrats leaked?
- Email this page
By JPNApril 11, 2006 - 12:29pmWow....
Did you think of that comeback all by yourself???
So, anyways, when is the last time a Democrat leaked (false) info to get us into an illegal war? And even if it ever happened, it wouldn't make what Bush did right. Can you follow that simple logic JPN?????
- Email this page
By clausen1April 11, 2006 - 12:37pmAre you kidding?
JPN still believes Nixon when he said "I'm no crook."
"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful and committed citizens can change the world."
Check out my blog:
http://truth-for-a-change.blogspot.com/
- Email this page
By MarlipernApril 11, 2006 - 12:45pmYa and it came to me real
Ya and it came to me real quick too....FALSE? WHEN WAS THAT PROVEN? He only stated the intel just as CLINTON and KERRY did in the past. Was it false then?
- Email this page
By JPNApril 11, 2006 - 1:05pmIt's false when
you misrepresent the importance or conclusions of intelligence. The Niger assertions about yellowcake uranium were not only not taken very seriously when they arose (the British intelligence services indicated their authenticity was highly doubtful), but were later demonstrated to be based on forged documents. Nonetheless, Shrubco. directed Libby to indicate the uranium procurement was a KEY FINDING of the National Intelligence Estimate.
Was it included in the NIE? Yes. On page 24 of the document. The key findings are bulleted on the first page. That's like compiling a list of offenses for Charles Manson, and including the fact that he cribbed answers to math tests in the 8th grade, then writing an essay on Manson, where the key point is : Charles Manson-CHEATER! and never addressing the mass murderer point.
Is it false information. YES, when it's misrepresented and misdirected. The intent of the "declassification" of PORTIONS of the NIE, essentially designed to rebut Wilson's findings (at least, according to Fitzgerald's filing) was to counter the assertion that Cheney had cooked the intelligence and misrepresented the threats (in other words, to counter the truth).
Telling a lie of omission (leaving out the valid intelligence and characterizations of the administration's justifications as unreliable and unlikely) is just as bad as overt lying.
You claim our national security wasn't harmed or threatened by the leaks? How do you figure? The information leaked was the basis for mounting a unilateral invasion, absent the authority (legal or moral) of the U.N. Our national security is threatened when the administration permits 23 members of the Saudi royalty to fly out of the U.S. on September 12, 2001 (when virtually every other civilian aircraft, including traffic helicopters was grounded by the FAA) without submitting to FBI interviews. The fact that some of them had contributed money to four of the hijackers was explained as random charity distribution, but not followed up.
This administration misrepresents its own actions (always on the positive side) and misrepresents and attacks those who differ (even when they started out as loyalists, but dared to tell the truth about the emperor's new clothes. Ask Richard Clarke (career counterterrorism advisor, advisor to Reagan, Poppy, Clinton and Shrub. Oh, BTW: Also a registered Republican). He called the 9/11 attacks on the money. He tried to get the administration to look at reality, rather than what they preferred to do, and his thanks was getting shit-canned.
Once someone teaches you to read (or offers to read it for you) pick up a copy of Against All Enemies (which is, btw, part of the president's oath of office. He's supposed to preserve, protect and defend the constitution of the u.s. from all enemies foreign and domestic. At this point, I'd settle for one out of three.
- Email this page
By davecbtApril 11, 2006 - 1:30pmSNAP!
Well said. Unfortunately, it will fall on deaf ears.
Like all cons, JPN has been conditioned by the administration's practice of: "If we tell the same lie often enough, people will think it's the truth." He needs some serious de-programming before he'll accept reality.
"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful and committed citizens can change the world."
Check out my blog:
http://truth-for-a-change.blogspot.com/
- Email this page
By MarlipernApril 11, 2006 - 1:41pmMarli--Adolf had his take on that as well....
"The great masses of the people…will more easily fall victims to a great lie than to a small one"--Adolf Hitler
JPN--Wir wissen schon dass Sie alles verstehen, weil Sie einen abgfickte Arschloch Fascist sind.
Sieg Heil !!!
Buwaaaaaaa haaaaaaa haaaaaaa
- Email this page
By AfricaBambaApril 11, 2006 - 4:23pmabsent the authority (legal
absent the authority (legal or moral) of the U.N
F&#$ the UN
Since I only have time to pop in and out and write small bullet points I pick and choose as I do... That's my CHOICE
- Email this page
By JPNApril 11, 2006 - 1:47pmYou don't have free choice anymore.
Didn't you read your weekly Nazi Youth Newsletter?
Dumbya outlawed free choice.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
God, I crack myself up.
"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful and committed citizens can change the world."
Check out my blog:
http://truth-for-a-change.blogspot.com/
- Email this page
By MarlipernApril 11, 2006 - 2:03pmJust like.....
....Bushbaby and the neocons.
"absent the authority (legal or moral) of the U.N
F&#$ the UN"
Then tell Bushbaby to quit. Pull us out. But....remember that the ORIGINAL JUSTIFICATION THAT DUMBYA GAVE for sending troops to Iraq was to ENFORCE UN RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORT INTERNATIONAL LAW.
That was before the UN decided not to give him the go for war, then he said FUCK the UN, and went ahead with what he wanted to do all along.
"Liberalism is trust of the people tempered by prudence. Conservatism is distrust of the people tempered by fear."
William Gladstone, 4-time Prime Minister of Great Britain.
- Email this page
By rocklibApril 11, 2006 - 2:16pmso the UN resolutions
against iraq really didn't mean anything did they?
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoApril 11, 2006 - 11:42pmAh-HA!
Ah-HA!... So you're pro-CHOICE then!
A G
- Email this page
By A GApril 12, 2006 - 7:23amname one
Name a democrat that declassified documents to discredit critics and then lied about it then lied about lying about it...I can think of one, but maybe you can make something up or call me a socialist or something else very witty. I can't wait
- Email this page
By potatocattleApril 11, 2006 - 12:49pmLeaky Leahy................
Leaky Leahy................
- Email this page
By JPNApril 11, 2006 - 1:06pm"Leaky Leahy"
Took responsibility for what he did. Like I said, it doesn't make it right for Bush to LIE. Man, JPN, you are pretty thick in the head. The sign that you are a Kool-aid drinker is that you can't even admit when Bush lies or makes a mistake. Is he your Messiah????
- Email this page
By clausen1April 11, 2006 - 1:11pmHe's not the messiah....
He's Caesar. All hail Bush!! Or maybe that should be "Heil Bush!!"
"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful and committed citizens can change the world."
Check out my blog:
http://truth-for-a-change.blogspot.com/
- Email this page
By MarlipernApril 11, 2006 - 1:23pmYou keep making those NAZI
You keep making those NAZI comments... But you are still alive so you must be wrong.
- Email this page
By JPNApril 11, 2006 - 2:02pmWell, even the Nazis......
...weren't "The Nazis" in 1934. But they had become "The Nazis" by 1937. And came to full flower by 1945. When we killed them.
It's lookin like, oh, say....1936 right now. Good year...Olympics, Jesse Owens....Barak Obama?
"Liberalism is trust of the people tempered by prudence. Conservatism is distrust of the people tempered by fear."
William Gladstone, 4-time Prime Minister of Great Britain.
- Email this page
By rocklibApril 11, 2006 - 2:56pmIf is looks like a Nazi, sounds like a Nazi, smells like a Nazi,
You do the math.
"But you are still alive so you must be wrong."
Gee JPN, are you suggesting that Nazis such as yourself would kill lil' old me? Oooh, I'm scared.
"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful and committed citizens can change the world."
Check out my blog:
http://truth-for-a-change.blogspot.com/
- Email this page
By MarlipernApril 11, 2006 - 3:18pmhitler
didn't open up the concentration camps right away. everything takes time.
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoApril 11, 2006 - 11:43pmHe only took responsibility
He only took responsibility because he was caught just like Doc in his SOCK Sandy B.
When a mistake is made I say so unlike you all. When something is done that I don't agree with I say so.
For me to admit anyone lied I NEED TO SEE THE PROOF. NOT SOM LIB WHO SAY IT SO MANY TIMES THEY BELEIVE IT"S TRUE...PROOF MATTERS.
- Email this page
By JPNApril 11, 2006 - 1:50pmI'm probably wasting my time here,
considering you don't have a pair large enough to check the replies to your ignorant posts. However, as long as you are speaking about ONLY taking responsibility after being caught, here are some more examples for you: Randy "Duke" Cunningham, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, (VERY soon to be) Tom "The Hammer" Delay. Obviously, I won't be holding my breath for a response.
- Email this page
By glamrock69April 11, 2006 - 5:16pmbush said he got good intel on iraq
he said that after he admitted he shouldn't have included the niger lie in his state of the union speech.
- Email this page
By mtmeggidoApril 11, 2006 - 11:14pmYou're right...
Leahy leaked info to reveal the truth. Bush leaked info. to support a lie.
"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful and committed citizens can change the world."
Check out my blog:
http://truth-for-a-change.blogspot.com/
- Email this page
By MarlipernApril 11, 2006 - 1:20pmOK,,, THAT MAKES THINGS
OK,,, THAT MAKES THINGS BETTER NOW....
- Email this page
By JPNApril 11, 2006 - 1:52pmOh, JPN
The only liberals who have done anything even remotely similar to what Bush has done is the LBJ Administration and getting us involved in Vietnam, which many of us liberals knew this Iraq fiasco would turn into. Of course, you supported the Vietnam war, and you thought it was a good thing.
Bush lied to get us into a war, he manipulated and falsified evidence to convince Americans and the Coungress that war was needed to protect the American people. Well, many of us were not fooled but enough were still frightened by the threat of terrorism to be swayed. Now cooler heads are examining the recent past and realizing what Bush has done. Now the approval of Bush is in the upper 30's.
He has repeatedly lied and mislead the U.S. public and the majority realize it. I was just looking at the most recent Rasmussen Poll. 40% of americans surveyed strongly disapprove of Bush. This is a staggering figure. Not only do people dislike him, the realy dislike him, many hate him. The number that somewhat approve of him is 20% and only 24% strongly approve. Now Rasmussen has been that most pro Bush poll among polls asking this question for a very long time so its statististics are slightly slanted in Bush's favor but none the less those numbers are horrible.
What is the primary reason people dislike Bush? He is a pathological liar. He is also a corpratist. He appears not to give a rats ass about the American people. Despite what you say about Clinton, the country was doing well under his administration. He had very favorable approval ratings up untill he left office. The only thing that the can be discredited for is he is an adulterer.
The issues of adultery and treason are not even remotely comparable unless you are living in a Monarchy, and then only the wife's adultery. Bush has committed treason. You are right that he has not been charged or convicted of any crimes dealing with the Plame investigation but that is only a symptom of Bush's treason. His conduct before and during the war in Iraq is what is truly treasoness.
He has been a God send for the Islamic terrorists. The Iraq situation is the best thing they could ever hope for. It gives them a rallying cause and brings them more and more supporters. This notion that keeping our forces in Iraq will protect us is nonsense. It did not protect Europe from terrorist attacks did it? His actions have weakened our nation and he did it for the profit of the rich. He is sacraficing the U.S. so his corprate buddies can make another billion dollars.
He has betrayed us all.
To everyone else, JPN is the quintessential example of why the republican's live by this moto, "Be thankful for the fools, but for them the rest of us couid not succeed". Mark Twain.
But for people like JPN, fools whose heads could not be cracked by one of Bush's nuclear bunker busters, the republicans could not be in office.
We must remember two things, the average IQ is 100 that means about half of the country has an IQ below that, most of them are probably conservatives.
Almost 40% of Americans still approve of the job Bush is doing. There must be something very wrong with our society if there are some many people who are utterly blind to reality.
"It was believed afterwards that the man was a lunatic, because there was no sense in what he said." "The War Prayer" by Mark Twain
- Email this page
By QuantaApril 11, 2006 - 3:49pm