THE TELEVISED EXECUTION OF KEVIN JAMES: IT'S NOT LIKE YOU HAVE TO KNOW ANYTHING TO BE A CONSERVATIVE TALK SHOW HOST
I know, I know. I laughed too. I absolutely loved seeing Chris Matthews eviscerate the pathetic conservative shill and mindless Bush acolyte, radio talk show host Kevin James, now the subject of national ridicule and the butt of jokes, much deserved at that. First, we’re not talking about this guy; it’s this guy.
How deserved, indeed. A man who went viral on YouTube instantaneously and enjoyed the fastest Wikipedia edit ever. Bless his heart; it was painful. From now on, this incredibly embarrassing moment will append this poor guy’s bio. Forever branded, perpetually tattooed with this incredible made for TV moment. I saw it live and wanted to bathe afterwards. It was like watching an Ali G interview but for real. Fox should included it in a summer replacement show “Interviews Gone Bad.” I was thinking My Lai, Kitty Genovese, name it. Throw in the towel, Kev! Somebody stop this mauling! Just give up.
Nah! Who am I kidding? I loved it. God, it was great. Schadenfreude. Watching this counterfeit conservative twist in the wind as Matthews begged him just to explain what the juxtaposition was between Obama and Chamberlain. Or at least to explain what Chamberlain did in the first place. Did he even know who Chamberlain was? Or which Chamberlain? (Dr. Kildaire or The Stilt?) Look, I’m sure Matthews is up on his Sudetenland history. I’m sure Munich Pact trivia is on the tip of his tongue. But most of us have at least a passing knowledge of the historical moment. We can see in our minds Chamberlain flashing that sheet of paper, his agreement with Hitler. But most of us would still brush up just a tad on our history before going on TV against the conservative-slayer Mark Green and Matthews himself. Especially when we’re told by a producer what the topic will be hours in advance. What was this guy thinking? I’ve been on these shows a bunch of times and in every instance a producer will email you page after page of background information on the subject. You’ve got hours to prepare. You just don’t walk in and think you can spew drivel and that it will work. This isn’t a conservative radio talk show that’s screened to avoid the slightest chance of being upstaged. People will challenge you. Sentient and informed people, that is, and not the mindless conservative acolytes who comprise your de minimis audience nod along in an hypnotic obeisance.
And why do I get the feeling that this clueless dude was on the phone immediately after his being violated, calling his friends and relatives with a gleeful yet clueless “Did you see me? I was great! National TV! Top of the world, Ma!” How sad. Look, Kevie Boy, are you out of your mind when you forget that we’re in a YouTube generation? Didn’t you see the 15 year-old “Inside Edition” clips of Bill O in a grand conniption meltdown? Channel 4’s Sue Simmons and her F-bomb moment? If it’s mildly entertaining, it’s plastered on the Internet. What were you thinking? And you were a lawyer, a prosecutor, no less. I trust you never showed up to court this unprepared.
He's now the poster boy for what’s wrong with conservative talk radio, not talk radio, but conservative talk radio. This cat never bothered to at least Google “appeasement” and refer to Wikipedia like everybody, and I mean everybody, else. You’d think that when he was told by an MSNBC producer that his presence was requested on “Hardball” with Matthews and Mark Green, a most formidable opponent I might add, he’d at least know what appeasement was and which one they were talking about. Didn’t he at least have the slightest curiosity as to what this concept was? Did he think it was an obstetrical procedure? (Get it? Episiotomy? Appeasement. Ahem.) Green was brutal when he admonished Mr. James that when one finds himself in a hole, it’s best to stop digging. Ouch! Funny, watching James I kept thinking of a certain classic sitcom.
Now I don’t know who this feller is -- never heard of him. And that’s not saying much. With 9043 active radio talk show hosts and all but 12 bumper sticker conservatives, it’s easy to lose track of who’s who. But I know their shtick: open the play book and recite by rote the party line. Chant the mantra. Bush is good, Republicans are good and Democrats want to facilitate terrorism. They’re effete and impuissant and want to hand Israel to Iran. Forget the fact that Dubya’s negotiating with Iran as we speak. And forget the fact that we’ve spoken with North Korea and Kim Jun Il who possesses WMD and “nucular” weapons. We’ve negotiated with Qadafi anent Lockerbie. (Quick. How many ways can you spell Qadafi? Answer: 83.) Bush 41 spoke repeatedly with Assad of Syria to get him on board regarding the first Gulf War. Nixon negotiated, note, negotiated and not merely spoke with China and the Soviet Union during Viet Nam when said countries were directly providing money, support and materiel to our enemy. Reagan and Nixon negotiated with the Soviet Union when they had nukes pointed at us. Nothing got in the way of discussion, negotiation and diplomacy.
So, what was Kevin James thinking? Nothing. And here’s the point.
- FILED UNDER: Host Posts
- May 16, 2008








Honestly?
Seriously- is this what is really being believed? The problem lies in what Lionel said in his post- Kevin James went home and said "Did you see me? I really stuck it to him."
AND PEOPLE AROUND HIM PROBABLY AGREED WITH HIM.
That is the problem. We, you all and myself included, choose to exchange in the economy of facts; provable ideas and vetted theories based upon those facts. Kevin James, or OReilly, or Limbaugh, or Hannity, or even McCain for that matter, can have their asses handed to them DAILY and it will not matter. Facts do not matter. The last president was the guy that we wanted a beer with, forget his multiple DUIs and admitted history of struggling with alcohol addiction. Make sense? No.
It is all about presentation, ILLUSION. It is prestidigitation, sans the 'digit' part.
Has no one asked why Israel is such a big issue in this coming election? Is it because of their 60th anniversary? Nope.
It is because Barack 'Hoo-SAYN' Obama, the crypto-Muslim Manchurian candidate. That’s what they say -right? It is branding and they have the best men to do it. We really need to wake the F@ck up and stop the moronic half-witty name labeling and stop thinking that we have this one in the bag. Come January 1st we will have a semi-senile, volatile, bellicose, man who is confused on his own positions and ill-equipped for designation of policy. We, as a voting block, are to blame. We are far too myopic, and retrospective. The Democratic Party has become the embodiment of the old criticism of the US Army- 'Always fighting the last war."
While we are busying ourselves with thoughts of Gore/Kerry, while we think of an invasive Supreme Court, hackable machines, Ohio voter manipulation, etc. we are not capable of recognizing the danger that lay right there-
Do you see it?
It is right there coming down the pipeline.
We will be crying foul, but we will be doing it from the sidelines if something isn't done NOW.
The facts don't matter, the adoption of the smear tactics will not work for us.
As Lionel says on his show nearly every day- not what we want, what do we THINK will happen. This is not about what is RIGHT or JUST, it is what is REAL.
This race will turn to race inevitable. It will hinge on that. Too much of an "angry black" then "too elitist." He wants to appease the Muslims, raise taxes, take away your guns etc.
They are the famous liberal taglines- but now they have the extra added fear of - the BLACK guy taking your money, the BLACK guy taking away your guns.
The BLACK MUSLIM that wants to talk with his friends, Iran.
See how it plays out?
I am voting for Obama. Not my first choice (Edwards) but he's a very good man for the job.
The meme has begun. While we play the name game (McSame, McBush, McLame) they are playing Death Race 2000, racking up points, counting bodies in their paths.
The meme is racism, fear of Islam, and destruction of Israel. It's got legs. They are already making the monkey shirts. Come November we will all be disgusted at what had transpired (and was tacitly acquiesced by the GOP).
So what do we do?- ANYONE?
How do we change the meme from the pervasive anti-intellectualism that controls this country, and return it to the enlightenment project that this country was founded as?
caspere@gmail.com
I am truly concerned both with those anti-intellectuals who vote for McCain after he will have been repeatedly "kevin-james-ed", as much as I am concerned by my compays that stand still while we get slaughtered again.
-Any concern of the past that does not present itself as a concern of the present threatens to disappear irretrievably into memory- WB
- parent
By caspere1May 17, 2008 - 4:17pm