World history books are full of stories about small, selfish megalomaniacs who were able to convince themselves that their ugliest conduct was justified for some higher good.
In those stories, the delusional power freak typically regards himself as almost a father figure who knows what's best for the rest of the world whether the rest of the world wants it or not.
In 1997, a group of those delusional megalomaniacs met with a purpose of organizing a neo-con nut cabal called the Project for a New American Century (PNAC). The goal of the group was empire building. Ground zero for that empire-building goal was the Middle East—specifically Iraq. Members of that secretive creepy group are the usual suspects: Dick Cheney, Steve Forbes, Paul Wolfowitz, Donald Rumsfeld and a dozen other misguided political neurotics who have a personal hero list that no doubt includes Napoleon Bonaparte and Julius Caesar. The PNAC has flourished for 11 years now.
There is a common theme in stories about empire building. It is that the last chapter of the story is always about disaster. There are few living scholars in the world who have analyzed empire building more thoroughly than Howard Zinn and Chalmers Johnson. In interviews with them, I learned about the dangers of building empires. Both Zinn and Chalmers agree that no country can maintain the bloated expansive level of the militarism that is required for the process. The Soviet, Roman and Ottoman Empires all failed because they squandered too many resources on a gargantuan military complex. They were not the kind of military structures designed to protect citizens from aggression at home. Instead, it was a military designed to expand and protect monied commercial interests of the empire.